Pee Talk & Questions
Talk and ask about all things related to peeing!
3,837 topics in this forum
-
- 62 replies
- 9.6k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 9 replies
- 2k views
-
- 22 replies
- 3.5k views
-
- 25 replies
- 4.8k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 26 replies
- 5.1k views
-
- 5 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 11 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 10 replies
- 2.9k views
-
- 6 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 2 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 36 replies
- 7k views
-
- 11 replies
- 2.8k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 7 replies
- 2.1k views
-
- 7 replies
- 1.4k views
-
- 8 replies
- 2.6k views
-
- 6 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 35 replies
- 5.3k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.6k views
-
- 2 replies
- 894 views
-
- 11 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 42 replies
- 8.5k views
.jpg.a9af1ca9f1dd49d791c02546cf5db7f2.thumb.jpg.2a7ca5b407ffe6ffc772270c3d33048e.jpg)
-
Who's Online (See full list)
- Blob
- peefan1000
- REBob
- elli_know
- 88mphArtist
- jofust
- ghostly94
- hefty
- Sophie
- LeatherGrrl
- aussiepeer
- jml03354
- pisskiddo
- DMP
- Crispy
- MilaGorohova
- Apollon
- adrian78
- EggyToast
- W1ll_B
- Pinkeln16
- Reading79
- geoffeyuk
- Nony
- johan_swe
- kiaman
- HazP33
- Paulp73
- annabelle2412
- Oleg777
- Admin
- WetDreamer
- Klaudia99
- not I
- GoldHelix
- Andrew Murphy
- Jason2099
- skippy
- Boomer167
-
Recent Posts
-
.thumb.gif.78e8522c31f883e664d2524016b1edbc.gif)
-
-
By randomiser · Posted
The best part of travelling on my own is the opportunity to use the hotel as my toilet. I can't count the number of places I've peed in hotels ... rooms, hallways, lifts, even the lobby on occasion. The only thing missing would be a lady to join me, but until then I'll just do my own thing. I love hotels. 🤣 -
By Carb0nBased · Posted
Why can't you just have a "Horny Owl's friends" thread where you add a new post every time there's an event? If people want to respond to a particular event, they can still quote the relevant post, it just means that there won't be dozens of threads to look through to find out what's happened lately with you. -
By Carb0nBased · Posted
I don't think this is bad photography as much as making an assumption about what the viewer wants to see. Many people like close-ups, therefore video creators try to include close-ups. Sometimes the zooming/panning in pee or other porn videos can look sloppy, though some of this may be just reflective of how involved the filming of "normal" videos often is. For many scenes in other films, there are multiple cameras capturing different angles (and multiple mics capturing sound from different places in the scene, especially for video of musical performances). I was recently watching this old demo for the first non-linear video editing tool, from 1971: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bNmsKBqFPQ . Of course the video quality was very poor by today's standards, but it's amazing how much editing they were already doing over 50 years ago. Effectively in order to make the video flow, they ironically had to chop up the original footage A LOT. However, capturing all these duplicate "takes" of the same scene requires a lot of equipment and cameras, and in addition to being expensive, I imagine this would put too much pressure on most pee actresses. So they're stuck with one videographer taking video the way someone would film a friend with his or her smartphone, even if using a much better camera. Personally it doesn't bother me that much--I like videos that feel almost "homemade" and not too staged. Video of a friend peeing by the side of the road can be much more exciting than many porn films, though there are some things that really ruin a video. Super poor resolution or exposure, like security camera footage, isn't interesting to watch, and neither is video where you can't see the stream, even more so when you can't even see a puddle or anything else wet.
-