Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...

I am an uncut American,  proud and happy to announce that. My doctor at birth said no to mutilating my dick, just said keep it clean.  I  have no problem pissing, indoors or out (mostly outdoors "dirty" pisses.) And I enjoy seeing other uncut men's cocks, in person or pics. Show 'em to me!

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
  • Hot 1
Link to post
On 9/1/2014 at 8:38 AM, lameduck58 said:

Happy to be uncut, circumcised guys will never know the fun of piss ballooning.

I love to hold my foreskin closed over the head of my cock as I piss and watch it balloon and then release it , feels great. You can't do that with a cut foreskin. 

  • Hot 1
Link to post
2 hours ago, WaterboyUk said:

I love to hold my foreskin closed over the head of my cock as I piss and watch it balloon and then release it , feels great. You can't do that with a cut foreskin. 

As a cut guy, I always find it a bit strange when I read comments like this. The majority of us gave no consent to what was done to us, nor given anesthesia during the process. The only silver lining is retaining no memory of what was most likely the most terrifying, painful, and cruel moment of our lives. Could you imagine intact women commenting this way about  women who have lost their clitoris to non-consensual surgery. "Cut girls can't imagine how good it feels to rub their clitoris." I don't know, just a thought. 

  • Agree 1
Link to post

A non-cut guy here. I agree with Simpfan about using the condom to simulate. I love having the non-cut dick, much more natural. And my GF agrees. Better late than never, here's a pic. 

896223357_download(4).jpeg.cce47d4e003b2c0f96dcc8a7ddcfaf9c (2).jpeg

Edited by Johnboy777
add'l material
Link to post
5 hours ago, Simpfan said:

The first sex I had was at 17. I tried to at 16, but the guy would have had to slam it in to break my hymen. So someone else did slam it in a year later. I had literal blood and massive pain. And it impregnated me. The first clitoral orgasm I had when I was 24. Everything else was from vaginal Intercourse or rubbing my legs together when my bladder was full. And that later part I learned in childhood.

My example had nothing to do with hymens. I was referring to female genital mutilation. While western media usually portrays it as an African practice, it's a problem that persists in the first world also. An intact woman is one who has not had parts of her genitalia forcibly removed or otherwise mutilated. In some cases it involves full or partial excision of the visible clitoral glans.  

Link to post

<snip> <snip> ... Get it cut, gentlemen ... 

"Health benefits: Male circumcision can reduce a male’s chances of acquiring HIV by 50% to 60% during heterosexual contact with female partners with HIV, according to data from three clinical trials. Circumcised men compared with uncircumcised men have also been shown in clinical trials to be less likely to acquire new infections with syphilis (by 42%), genital ulcer disease (by 48%), genital herpes (by 28% to 45%), and high-risk strains of human papillomavirus associated with cancer (by 24% to 47% percent).

While male circumcision has not been shown to reduce the chances of HIV transmission to female partners, it does reduce the chance that a female partner will acquire a new syphilis infection by 59%. In observational studies, circumcision has been shown to lower the risk of penile cancer, cervical cancer in female sexual partners, and infant urinary tract infections in male infants."

https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/fact-sheets/hiv/male-circumcision-HIV-prevention-factsheet.html 

Pee S:  As Elaine said in Seinfeld, referring to an uncut ex: "It had no personality!" 

Pee Pee S: And these studies had nothing to do with Dr. Fredo so let's not go there! :) 

Pee Pee Pee S: And you do know what the treatment is for penile cancer, don't you?   ✂️

Edited by Peevert
Link to post
6 hours ago, Peevert said:

<snip> <snip> ... Get it cut, gentlemen ... 

"Health benefits: Male circumcision can reduce a male’s chances of acquiring HIV by 50% to 60% during heterosexual contact with female partners with HIV, according to data from three clinical trials. Circumcised men compared with uncircumcised men have also been shown in clinical trials to be less likely to acquire new infections with syphilis (by 42%), genital ulcer disease (by 48%), genital herpes (by 28% to 45%), and high-risk strains of human papillomavirus associated with cancer (by 24% to 47% percent).

While male circumcision has not been shown to reduce the chances of HIV transmission to female partners, it does reduce the chance that a female partner will acquire a new syphilis infection by 59%. In observational studies, circumcision has been shown to lower the risk of penile cancer, cervical cancer in female sexual partners, and infant urinary tract infections in male infants."

https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/fact-sheets/hiv/male-circumcision-HIV-prevention-factsheet.html 

Pee S:  As Elaine said in Seinfeld, referring to an uncut ex: "It had no personality!" 

Pee Pee S: And these studies had nothing to do with Dr. Fredo so let's not go there! 🙂

Pee Pee Pee S: And you do know what the treatment is for penile cancer, don't you?   ✂️

This is a topic in which I have done a great deal of research, and I'm afraid your studies are nowhere near as compelling as you think they are. One of them used Kenyan long haul truck drivers as a sample group. Let that marinate for awhile citizen of the first world. 

  • Like 3
Link to post
11 minutes ago, Takashi96 said:

This is a topic in which I have done a great deal of research, and I'm afraid your studies are nowhere near as compelling as you think they are. One of them used Kenyan long haul truck drivers as a sample group. Let that marinate for awhile citizen of the first world. 

I have noticed that you guys who are uncut get all emotional when the health issue comes up but it really is true.  Guys who are cut are less likely to catch diseases like AIDS from a women versus guys who are uncut.  Also less likely to transmit disease to a woman.  

Link to post

Well, once it's cut there's not much going back - and you don't miss what you never (remember) having.

Conversely for those with a foreskin they're entitled to be attached to it - it's attached to them of course.

Some will say tom-ay-toe and others tom-ah-toe but we all live happily ever after.

  • Like 2
Link to post
11 minutes ago, Peevert said:

I have noticed that you guys who are uncut get all emotional when the health issue comes up but it really is true.  Guys who are cut are less likely to catch diseases like AIDS from a women versus guys who are uncut.  Also less likely to transmit disease to a woman.  

I've noticed these outdated, deeply flawed, studies used frequently as coping mechanisms for cut guys who had no consent in the matter. By the way, I believe the last westerner to get AIDS from a woman was Magic Johnson and he's still here. However you are correct that cut guys have a slightly better chance of not catching AIDS during unprotected sex in the developing world. So you're in a safer position than the uncut gentleman who exchanged a goat for sexual favors. 

Edited by Takashi96
  • Agree 1
Link to post

That's like saying we had no consent in being conceived.  True, but irrelevant.  

I'm not turning this into a pissing contest.  You're getting a little overly sensitive.  The numbers are there, choose to believe them or choose not to believe them.  

Link to post
  • 3 weeks later...

Content Warning: Discussion of potential mutilation and potential violence against children

Fellow penis-havers and penis-lovers, what's your take on circumcision? This may be something of a controversial topic so I'll say upfront that I don't wanna be argumentative about it. Personally, I don't think it's morally justifiable as a practice in the modern day. It's not "more hygienic" like people claim (in fact it can cause a number of hygiene problems in and of itself) and it's typically performed on infants who don't have a say in the matter. Even in terms of religious practice I still think it's dubious at best, (again, not meaning to step on any toes or invalidate the input of people from these religious groups. I'm not religious so take that as you will) at least wait until the person is mature enough to make the decision and believe in the religion themselves before having them participate in that sort of ritual; it shouldn't simply be a commonplace procedure done right after birth. 

I myself am circumcised but despite my beliefs on circumcision being mostly negative I'm not looking to restore my foreskin nor do I hold a lot of stock with  foreskin restoration groups for a number of reasons. Perhaps the silliest of those reasons is that I just don't think foreskin is hot. I dunno what it is but despite being thirsty as all hell, uncircumcised penises are (usually) less attractive to me. This is probably for a number of reasons, for one I didn't even know foreskin existed for an embarrassingly long time, also my scant few experiences involving dicks were all with other circumcised people. Unfortunately I think I'm in the majority in this case, atleast where I live. Because of how commonplace circumcision has become, I've seen people who aren't very charitable to uncircumcised people or are equally as uneducated as I once was and think foreskin's "icky" or "unnatural". 

Peefolks who are dick-owners and/or dick-enjoyers, lemme know your two cents! Also, sorry uncircumcised folks for validating you in the first half then calling you less attractive in the second half. Feel free to dick me down sometime so I can be proven wrong (kidding) ❤️

Edited by Peenicks
Added clarity
Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...