WantonLee

I just realized that the pictures were scaled down when I uploaded them, so here are the originals: (Part 1)

I've been browsing my computer and found, that a good deal of the pictures I have are not actual photos of peeing ladies, but rather artificially created. Some of them are 3D-Art, other are drawings - of various types. So, I selected a few pictures to show what I mean, and what I like - or dislike - about them. Let me know what YOU think. :biggrin: An apology in advance to all the (straight) ladies here: I have only collected pictures of ladies, so excuse me to show only those. But there is definitely male material out there, I simple ignored it. (Note: as I prefer solo peein

Hmm, I can't quite imagine any historical event I'd like to see in person. Considering that I just posted an answer to the "conspiracy"-thread, I probably would like to have a look inside the planes that hit the WTC-Buildings, or check the debris of the WTC right after it fell for... particular pieces of evidence. But then again, to what use ? Unless such a Time-Window-Machine (I call it that way because it would only allow you to take a look at past events, not send you there in person) would be used by scientists, and for the purpose of ACTUALLY uncover the truth, it's just not worth b

When it comes to conspiracy theories, I have to admit that I agree with some of them, if only up to certain points. Like for instance 9/11: I saw "Loose change", too, and have to agree to some points they had; then again other points I find rather ridiculous. Or JFK: Physics 101 tells you that Lee Harvey Oswald could NOT have been the only one shooting at JFK (if he was involved at all, and not only have been a scapegoat), since JFK's head was thrown back at some point - ~apparently~ by a bullet. And that bullet could not have come from above and behind him, because his head would then h

Well, as long as both participants like it, it's perfectly fine. I personally do not like to drink pee, nor do I like the whole domination thing, at least not on such a... professional level as demonstrated by the picture above. (To quote the German poet Hoffmann von Fallersleben: "Nobody's master, nobody's servant.")

Hello, New Admin! :wink: As the fact that I am only replying that late after this thread was started, it should be quite apparent the I am one of the lesser active members of this forum. You asked a couple of questions, so while I'm here, I will try to answer them. (Please note that English is only my second tongue, so if something I wrote seems to not make sense, just ask for clarification.) 1. What do you currently not like about the site? For me there is no real issue. A minor problem would be that sometimes topics get mixed up... in.. well... how do I describe that... I'll give

paul66, i think you missed my point, or probably I was not able to get my point across in the first place (and probably wont be able to do it now, either). I was in no way suggesting that fannywatcher should call the police and tell them he has evidence of a lady damaging property of someone else adn demand her arrest. (If he does, good luck - as neither he nor we know the identity of the lady nor that of her... "victim". Besides: I really really doubt the police will follow such kind of hints, unless someone has reported this"crime" in the first place, and even then I doubt the officers

@ fannywatcher: I totally agree with you from the moral point of view. It's simply not ok to damage someones property (unless that person doesn't mind). However, this is what I personally find thrilling (to some extend; peeing on the carpet of a large hotel is not nearly as worse as doing that on, say, your neighbors carpet. Telling you that I don't find this thrilling would be a lie, and I'm not going to lie just to end this debate. Anyhow, I'm not going to encourage anyone to do such things. Plus one has to be aware that this could get someone arrested (apart from the more severe

Funny thing is, I do not doubt his claim that he had gotten laid "100's of time", although I wouldn't be surprised that he was exaggerating slightly and the "100's of times" was only a rhetorical figure. What's REALLY funny is his claim that he was here to get laid. I am not ~quite~ sure about this whole business (as I am no Don Juan, more the opposite of it), but from my limited experience I would assume that "getting laid" involves another person - namely the one you would want to get laid by. So, he was assuming that he could find exactly that kind of person here. Hmm. I think we

To each their own. But if this is really your intention, and you are not trolling, then you have surely come to the wrong place (which you could easily have noticed if you were following this thread), and therefor wasted your (and our) time. Come to think of it: why do I even write this ? o_0

My 24,021 Cent's: I'm torn. On one hand - being a fan of naughty peeing - I of cause like to see ladies peeing where they are not supposed to. Especially if the cause any kind of (probably lasting) damage. If you'd ask me why I like this kind of kinky act, I am unable to give you any sensible answer. Probably there is no one single cause for this. One cause might be, because ruining (or even damaging) stuff has something to do with experiencing some kind of power over something (for me it's not so much about someONE, but someTHING). Another thing to consider is that "crossing a l

Well, since my native tongue is German, in the everyday live I use neither. :wink: When it comes to my fetish I also don't use those words, but rather listen to them (porn, ya know?) And in that case I prefer.... well, that totally depends on HOW the words are used. Being a fan of naughty peeing, it is not so much the words that are used, but rather what they imply. A whispered "I'm going to wet the bed." could be waaaay more sexy then a matter of factually stated "I'm gonna pis the bed!" Especially if there is this slight tremor of lust in her voice.... . :angelic:

I think I already answered this question. Considering that most of us will never have (intimate) contact with a Celebrity, the whole thing is only a wild fantasy, and for that matter falls in the category of "porn". To quote wikipedia: "Pornography (...) is the portrayal of sexual subject matter for the purpose of sexual arousal." Apart from the fact that not all female celebrities are beautiful and glamorous (as you rightfully said), also not all beautiful (or glamorous) ladies are celebrities. Regarding the "you dont like watching glamourous women pee then?"-part: Only if they do it

Hmm. Unlike anyone else, for me there is no celebrity - famous or otherwise - that I'd like to see peeing. At least not because they are famous. When it comes to this fetish (and more specifically: porn about it) I only care for woman who enjoy what they are doing, so neither staged stuff or celebrities do it for me. May I ask why the celebrity-part is so important to you all ?

How extreme is too extreme... for whom ? And: objective or subjective ? I would say: as long as all participants enjoy what is going on, an no one is subjected to permanent physical or mental damage, it is ok. Also no physical or mental harm should be done to uninvolved third parties (and/or their property). That being said, I think my particular... branch of the pee-fetish, namely naughty peeing (aka spoiling/ruining stuff) would indeed be to extreme... . However, I have yet to live up my fetish. So: no (real) harm done... yet... . Another thing would be involving living things in

I remember I was listening to the audiobook of Terry Pratchetts Discworld-Novel "Mort", in which Albert, Death's manservant, was talking to said Mort. I can't remember the context, but I do remember that Albert tried to tell Mort something about the Princess and the Pea. However, his memory was not quite accurate, as he described her as being "...so noble, she could pee through a dozen mattresses." For some odd reason I am unable to remember the rest of that particular paragraph.... o_0 Speaking of Terry Pratchetts Discworld Novels, in an other story (Unseen Academicals) one of the cha

likesToLick and Sephora pretty much nailed my own point of view. About your original question: Your "friend" should not be so worried. If her Ex would try to press charges against her all she would need to do is claiming that HE raped HER. The rest (trail and conviction) should just be formality nowadays. I mean, seriously, who would believe A MAN that he was sexually assaulted by a WOMAN, anyway ? ;) What you friend has done: Well, she pee'd her Ex in the mouth. Fine for most people here (apparently). But what would be if HE would have done that, and she was the one who did no

I am actually quite pee shy, ironically. I have never been watched by a lady so far, so i can only speculate if i would be less shy if a lady would watch me out of interest; especially if she is into the whole pee sort of thing. But i guess it would make me much more relaxed. At least when it comes to the shyness. ;)

Staged peeing does not work for me. I absolutely prefer genuine stuff, even if the quality is not that good. Stuff like that TamtamSouth made when she was still "in the business", so to speak.

I am in neither of those situations, so my answer is mostly hypothetical: If there is love then my fetish would not matter. On the other hand i doubt such a relationship would last very long, unless really everything else that is important for me would be a 100% match.

I only know some German words and euphemisms. While "pissen" translates simply to "to piss" or "pissing", "pinklen" would be more like "piddle", however it is use as often as "pissen" and therefore is more the equivalent of "peeing". "Strullen" and "schiffen" means basically the same as "to piss" or "to pee", but are used a bit less frequently. Other, more diminutive word are "pullern" or "pillern", and especially "Pipi machen" (lit."to make pee pee"). More euphemistic phrases are: "Ich muss mal für kleine Mädchen" - lit.: "i need to go for little girls" Alternatively one can use

^ Pretty much this; although i personally care more for ladies, rather then female dogs. On the other hand i did had my fair share of... naughty pee's, but on one hand i am not as active as i would like to be, and on the other hand i have that much respect for the property of others that my naughtiest pee's - while they "involved" carpets, wallpapered walls and even curtains - happened in a long abandoned building, rather then... say a hotel room. (And of cause, the fear to be caught has also played a role in my choice of... playgrounds.)

After reading the original post in this thread my first thought was . Would someone put up the times CustomerCare and I had an intimate night with a Lady in a bar diagram, my bar could hardly be distinguished from "0". Also, I never met a Lady with an interest for peeing... . But being 40 now, I have half a life ahead of me to change that ! ... not. :P

House Party Posted June 14th, 2011 at 10:01AM By: Sickgurl A couple of weeks back I went to a house party with my friend as the guy she likes and is now going out with was going. It was a pretty useless party really, one of the geeky guys from school had the house to himself and had been having a party there for three days. This was a Friday night and his parents came back on Sunday so this was the last night of the party leaving him Saturday to get things straight. We got there and the only fit guy there was Lee who was the guy she was lusting after so I was in for a night of no fun.

My Neighbours House Posted June 15th, 2012 at 2:11PM By: Sickgurl Yesterday my neighbours moved out of their house. They have gone to live in Sweden and they flew out late last night. When I found out today I went round as I have a key they have forgotten about. I was just being nosey as I have never been upstairs there but when I opened the door all their stuff is still there. Mostly in boxes but the big stuff like the sofas and beds are as normal. When I saw this I got that butterfly feeling in my tummy, I opened some of the boxes which were full of books and kitchen stuff, borin