Slow motion pissing: Yes or no?

[Admin 14,788]

Many videos include slow motion peeing, but do you find this annoying and not as interesting, or do you enjoy watching piss in slow motion? Does it depend on the video? Share your thoughts on this.

[DiaperFun 14]

Many videos include slow motion peeing, but do you find this annoying and not as interesting, or do you enjoy watching piss in slow motion? Does it depend on the video? Share your thoughts on this.

I like to watch when diapers are drowned in slow motion, and some other things is also fun watching in slow motion.

[wetmanjf 2,787]

I don't like slow motion...I enjoying seeing it just as it happens....:biggrin:

wetmanjf

[JoeBob563 131]

I agree with wetmanjf and Kevin. Slowmo is annoying...

[steve25805 126,021]

I generally agree that slow motion is annoying and would rather see the stream in real time. But I also agree with Egwalrus that in certain exceptional circumstances it can work very well, though more generally I would rather not see it slowed down.

[Juzernejm 0]

I like it.

[nopjans 1,178]

I am not a fan of slow motion.

[kiaman 29]

No, slow motion is useless. I don't like how some use it to falsely extend videos,

[Starks2010 2,197]

Slow

Many videos include slow motion peeing, but do you find this annoying and not as interesting, or do you enjoy watching piss in slow motion? Does it depend on the video? Share your thoughts on this.

slow motion is annoying. It kills the whole mood.

[peemylove 6]

slow mo is stupid

[Country Man 75]

Under normal circumstances, I agree about slow motion. There are cases when it does work and those are where the pee is either short or hard to notice. Examples would be someone peeing in a swim suit at the beach...

Right on target.

There might be a few others, for artistic purposes, like a gigantic pee fountain. But mostly I'm interested in the real-time experience.

[mikeviewline 85]

In a word - No.

[Sophie 24,410]

As others have said, it's a no from me. The only time I don't mind it is if we see the stream in real time first. Similar to the videos where they show the same clip but from different camera angles.

[F.W 5,734]

As others have said, it's a no from me. The only time I don't mind it is if we see the stream in real time first. Similar to the videos where they show the same clip but from different camera angles.

They do that in some of the Japanese voyeur.Show the same girl,but with maybe 2 different angles.In that case,slo-mo would absolutely ruin it.

[F.W 5,734]

On a very different note,but related to slo-mo,the BBC nowadays tends to use it in all its wildlife films,even when the animal is just asleep.Or if a Falcon gets a pigeon,all filmed in slo-mo.I think it draws out a 30 min film,into a 50 min slot.I hate slo-mo when done for arty-farty reasons!

[PeeFan86 288]

Nope, absolutely hate it

[whiz kid 201]

Slow motion is great.  Love seeing how the stream exits her body and seeing the force of the urine spread her labia apart.

[MrTickle 58]

Normal speed is best most of the time.

But what would be interesting.. have you ever seen those super-slow motion videos? I can imagine it would be quite interesting to see a super-slow-mo female pee video, if the quality was high. It would need one of those specialist high-frame-rate cameras though.

Edited January 4, 2017 by MrTickle

[mikeviewline 85]

Slow motion?  No not for me.

[uniloo 98]

Ultra slow motion would be OK just for the start of the pee. Seeing the urethra open and the first drops coming out before it turns into a continuous stream. But for general peeing, no.

[F.W 5,734]

No.Surely the whole enjoyment comes from viewing the force of it?When a girl has force,she can piss for yards,i find more powerfully than a guy even.Also the sound of it hitting the water,or ground is amazing.I like to see a girl produce a litre in 20 seconds.

Edited February 18, 2017 by fannywatcher