Jump to content

Calling all pee video creators & women of PeeFans!


Admin

Recommended Posts

To all the guys still reading... unfortunately fellas I just don't think there's the same level of interest for paid videos of guys peeing at this point. HOWEVER...

If you know of anyone who may be interested in this opportunity, for example a model you're subscribed to on another site (like onlyfans/clips4sale etc) and you refer them, you will get a free giftcard when this new section gets built!

How It Works:

1. Ask them if they'd be interested in making more sales & reaching new fans (with no real extra work?) 

2. If yes, send them a link to this thread so they can see the details.

3. Just ask them to mention your forum username on the very last question... if they do, you will get a giftcard to spend on any videos of your choosing once everything is setup! 

 

Remember, it's fine if they are already selling clips elsewhere, and it's also fine if they're not. The key thing is they're happy to create pee videos. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Guest UnabashedUser

 In favor of any additional way to get revenue into this site.  Quality pay clips would do it, as would the ability to comment on clips watched.

Go for it.

Would like to see a "must offer a percentage for free" of the paid pee clips as a requirement for publishing the paid clips. That would add incentive for drawing other people to the site, and a great way for the creator to build an interest.

 

Link to post

Personally, I think it’s homophobic to not include men. I’ve always found this website to be a little weird and ‘precious‘ about ensuring straight men don’t see other men. That said, it isn’t my website and I enjoy the content so I respect the structure here. Pornhub did a study and about 25% of their users were women.

 I also don’t understand, operationally, how including men would make a project like this more difficult?  And, besides, how would you deal with models who collaborate on videos and who are doing heterosexual scenes, with a male and female in them? Isn’t that man entitled to his fair share of the pay for his work? I think it’s a poor precedent. 

  • Like 3
Link to post
  • 2 weeks later...
On 9/26/2020 at 9:54 PM, nycmarker said:

Personally, I think it’s homophobic to not include men. I’ve always found this website to be a little weird and ‘precious‘ about ensuring straight men don’t see other men. That said, it isn’t my website and I enjoy the content so I respect the structure here. Pornhub did a study and about 25% of their users were women.

 I also don’t understand, operationally, how including men would make a project like this more difficult?  And, besides, how would you deal with models who collaborate on videos and who are doing heterosexual scenes, with a male and female in them? Isn’t that man entitled to his fair share of the pay for his work? I think it’s a poor precedent. 

I understand your concerns but I'm not a fan of the word homophobic being thrown around for what is quite simply a business decision, and not remotely to do with sexual orientation. 

It's not that men won't ever be able to participate in this, but I can assure you there is a significantly higher demand for paid clips of women than men (much higher than 75/25). I am not saying there's no interest in male clips of course, and we have a section where guys can share their own clips already.

But clearly one of the goals of this project is to raise more money for the site, so there would be no logic to excluding 50% of the population on a whim. But it's not as simple as 'just let everyone participate' - there are lots of other variables; cost of hosting clips, verifying participants, managing payments & payouts to name just a couple... so we are looking for a small number of people to partner with initially, and so it makes most sense to partner with people whose clips we think will be most in demand. 

In terms of videos featuring both men and women, it would become too complex to be splitting payments for the same video to multiple people (regardless of gender). It would be up to participants in the video to sort compensation out between themselves. Although the site will be exclusively for pee videos, so other than golden showers, I can't really envision what those videos would be anyway. We're not talking about professionally produced porn videos here.

Again, if/when things are up and running we will definitely look into expanding to paid male content as well, but I already know that there would be many men happy to create amateur clips to sell, which is why it was important to see the levels of female interest first (as that I wasn't so sure of).  

As for the site's structure, indeed the majority of our users are straight men who come here for only female content, but regardless of someone's orientation I feel it makes sense to have a separate category so it's easier for everyone to find what they want. I'm not sure what advantage there would be of mixing both together.

I appreciate you voicing your feedback though. Even though it may not be the answer you were hoping for, I can promise you that we do want to be an inclusive site for all. 

  • Like 4
Link to post

I am only interested in Male content but not interested in purchasing content , but just wanted to say that I find this site really accepting and open, much more so than other forums which can be really anti Male content 🙂

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
  • 3 months later...

Quick update for everyone:

  • I believe I have figured out a way this would be possible. And whilst we probably still would be starting out with a limited number of content creators initially as a trial, I can confirm the plan would be to allow anyone (male or female) to sell their clips.
  • To anyone who is interested in selling videos, please be aware there would be a quick private verification process involved (similar to any other site) so that we can ensure all sellers are who they claim to be. 
  • Since Onlyfans appear to be drastically cutting down on pee clips, the hope would be we could attract some of the creators there and give them a new avenue to sell their pee clips, so for this to work we'd really need people to let their favourite creators about this new initiative. I'll admit I don't really know much about onlyfans or who makes pee videos there, but I imagine plenty of people here do have knowledge of that. 
  • The big limitation to all of this, and the only thing holding it back right now, is payment processors. I won't bore you with all the details, but they take a fat slice since adult sites are 'high risk', and any chargebacks (even if they are unfair) can cost us big fees. So we would realistically need to set a minimum clip price of perhaps $5, and possibly even a minimum total payment of $10+.

    I guess my question to you all is whether this kind of restriction (e.g. a minimum checkout amount) would deter you from buying? It's certainly not ideal, but would help make the whole thing possible. Ultimately this is only worth doing if it's going to be a good result for everyone involved (buyers, sellers, and PeeFans). For any buyers out there, do you think you would be happy to pay above $5 per clip if it were the right clips, and would a hypothetical $10 minimum checkout bother you much?  
Link to post

I don't think a minimum price of $5 per clip is unreasonable. There may be issues with a $10 minimum checkout, however. If I only want one $5 or $7 clip, I might not buy anything if I can't get to the minimum threshold. 

  • Agree 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
6 hours ago, Bacardi said:

I wish you could do this anonymously. I would love to try creating content but the though of uploading a picture of my ID frightens me. 

If you were to host videos on a third party site - like Erome for example, you could quite validly have a completely separate user name and just post links here "hey, look at this content creator I follow".

I would guess @Adminmay allow something similar here where video's were hosted but against a 'pseudonym' so they are anonymous.

Link to post
7 hours ago, gldenwetgoose said:

f you were to host videos on a third party site - like Erome for example, you could quite validly have a completely separate user name and just post links here "hey, look at this content creator I follow".

Well I would want to do it and get paid for it like OF. Its not specifically the admin team I dont trust with my personal information, its just in general I'm a paranoid person about these kinds of things. Been on the site for 3 years now and I'm still afraid of someone figuring out who I am lol. If I could do it without sharing anymore info than I give away now I would totally be apart of only-pee-fans, but my anxiety says no!

  • Like 1
Link to post
On 2/2/2021 at 1:31 AM, Bacardi said:

I wish you could do this anonymously. I would love to try creating content but the though of uploading a picture of my ID frightens me. 

I was thinking that there would also be a less formal way of verifying too - for example recording a video of yourself writing peefans on a piece of paper or something.

As long as I can verify that the person selling the videos is the same person that's making them, that's all that matters, so there should be ways of us doing that without needing formal documents. 🙂  

 

  • Agree 1
Link to post
30 minutes ago, Admin said:

I was thinking that there would also be a less formal way of verifying too - for example recording a video of yourself writing peefans on a piece of paper or something.

As long as I can verify that the person selling the videos is the same person that's making them, that's all that matters, so there should be ways of us doing that without needing formal documents. 🙂  

 

I really would like to try to do this Can we plz talk in messages. I’m also mad that onlyfans purged peeing?

Link to post

Great idea, and I would pay for such content, especially if I could agree with someone a scenario or so. and then preferably per video. Maybe a thought to allow the possibility to pay a larger sum at once (let's say 50 USD/EUR) and then have 10 credits to view/download specific movies against 1 or more credits depending on length/specific request or so.

  • Love 1
Link to post
4 hours ago, Admin said:

I was thinking that there would also be a less formal way of verifying too - for example recording a video of yourself writing peefans on a piece of paper or something.

As long as I can verify that the person selling the videos is the same person that's making them, that's all that matters, so there should be ways of us doing that without needing formal documents. 🙂  

 

Then where do I sign up lol.

  • Love 1
  • Hot 1
Link to post
5 hours ago, moremichael said:

Great idea, and I would pay for such content, especially if I could agree with someone a scenario or so. and then preferably per video. Maybe a thought to allow the possibility to pay a larger sum at once (let's say 50 USD/EUR) and then have 10 credits to view/download specific movies against 1 or more credits depending on length/specific request or so.

Yes, a token-based system like MDH uses might be useful to address the minimum charge issue. One could buy credits in advance, and apply them to videos produced by content creators.

Edited by nopjans
  • Agree 2
  • Love 1
Link to post
  • 2 years later...

This is a cool idea, i could even pay for it if not too much for me (most definetly will) and all game if it ever expands to male content, i share a lot, but never tried to sell it, because i know male content isnot as popular as female, but who knows, if the idea flies, maybe we can make it work!

Edited by AWN_84
Link to post
  • 7 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...