Pee Conversations / Scenes on Mainstream TV

[gldenwetgoose 20,253]

Something I spotted this week, the UK BBC2 comedy Henpocalypse...

It's a six part comedy series where a viral pandemic breaks out whilst a group of women are on a hen weekend in a remote cottage.  The virus kills (almost) all men, with civilisation descending into tribal chaos.   Within the first two minutes of the programme (1:10 in) the bride to be jumps out of the car to have a wee behind a bush, the screen grab is as graphic as it gets.

Then later in the first episode which jumps several months into the apocalypse a scene opens with one of the group sitting on a bucket to pee (with realistic audio).   Again not really graphic.

I didn't find the comedy worth watching in full, although all parts are available - if anyone spots anything more please feel free to add it.

It's available on BBC iPlayer for those that have it, apologies it's region specific and needs a sign-in (hence I haven't posted a direct link).

 

[mickymoist 3,336]

I'm sure it must be a trick of the light but in a Sanex ad, currently running in the uk, it looks very much like someone has wet themselves a little 😁

[Alfresco 11,002]

On 11/5/2023 at 10:45 AM, Kupar said:

Not really news, but an interesting letter in the Guardian (UK) yesterday. A couple of pointers to movies our members might want to check out:

Further to the above, I found a Pee scene in I May Destroy You, available on BBC iPlayer, Series one, Episode 3, at 17:50.  The Bella stops to pee on the pavement after a night out drinking.  First shot is a close up as she is squatted and starts to pee.

As the pee rolls down the slope the camera shot widens to show her male companion stood with his back to her.  She says "If you look I swear to God that I will fucking kill you".  You can hear a nice trickle.

Edited November 7, 2023 by Alfresco

[Alfresco 11,002]

Another clip in episode 2 of "I may destroy you", @ 21:22 shows peeing in a cup for a drugs test following suspicion of her drinks being spiked:

Not much to see here though.  Just her on the toilet bent forward and extracting a cup from between her legs.

[Alfresco 11,002]

I also had to look up Rye Lane from the above post.   This one starts off in a unisex toilet probably in an art gallery, although it may also be a club looking at what is going on.   The camera runs along above the stalls showing what's going on in each stall, including some fighting, a woman changing a baby's nappy, a guy peeing, three girls doing selfies, a guy passed out on the floor next to the toilet, a girl vomiting with a friend consoling her and then there is a guy crying whilst looking at a video on his phone.  Some artistic licence is used because according to the camera going over the top of the stalls, the crying guy is in the 7th stall, but when it is shown from the floor area, he is in stall 5.

A woman is by the sinks and says some things to herself before going into a cubicle next to the guy.  She starts to pee with a very nice tinkle when he says "Hello".  She stops peeing and says "Hello" back.  He says "This is the gents" and she says "No, it's unisex", then carries on peeing with more nice tinkling.

There is a shot from the front showing both stalls side by side - which is a bit strange because they both shut their doors but hey:

 

[oliver2 3,899]

1 hour ago, Alfresco said:

She says "If you look I swear to God that I will fucking kill you"

Oh, well. That’s not exactly what we were hoping for 🙃

[Kirby23 777]

My wife and I recently started watching the series "1923," which is a follow-on story to the series "Yellowstone." In the first episode, one of the main characters is introduced, Spencer, who is a WWI veteran working in Africa as a big game hunter.

He is hired by a tourist group to hunt a leopard which has been stalking their camp. In one part he pees on the outside of his tent, to attract the leopard (so he can hunt it). Later in the episode, he is staked out at night, waiting for the leopard to make an appearance. A pretty, young blonde woman is shown exiting her tent, and she then pops a squat in the tall grass just outside her tent. This, of course, attracts the leopard...

It doesn't really show much of her peeing, but you can hear the sound. We usually watch TV with the closed captions on. In this particular scene it said "(Peeing)". That was funny to me, because usually captions are a little more formal. For example, it often says "(urinating)" or similar.

This was also interesting because the peeing was actually part of the plot (e.g. peeing in the African wild attracts predators).

 

[gldenwetgoose 20,253]

If you're here to read about an arousing Pee related programme, this isn't it.  But I would recommend watching this one...    It was incredibly uncomfortable viewing, and a bit of a wake up call.

Last night in the UK, Channel 4 showed a new episode of the documentary '24 Hours In Police Custody' with the episode called 'The Night Prowler'.   The programme is a real life police documentary, filmed in Luton, Bedfordshire with the premise being that under UK law a person arrested on suspicion of having committed a crime can be detained for 24 hours to gather evidence for prosecution.

So, last night's episode featured a young guy who's seen in the opening credits walking through a city at night and making a selfie video of himself talking.  The camera work is very shaky, and in the opening credits is a girl talking 'we're having a wee, will you turn off that torch'....   Instantly of course I pricked my ears up.  Although there isn't really anything visually shown.

Anyway - as soon as the titles have rolled, the programme cuts to the victim and bodycam footage.   An intoxicated lady who's been refused entry into a nightclub, and instead has gone into an alleyway just next to it.  When she emerges she's extremely distressed and the club door staff look after her until police arrive.  She reports that the guy has placed his cock in her mouth.  Using local CCTV police identify the guy entering the alley after her and leaving in a different direction, they then track him and an hour or so later he's arrested on suspicion of rape.

The programme then shows the interviews with him taking place over his 24 hours of detention and in between, police obtaining CCTV footage and clips from his phone.   In interview he starts being completely innocent and upset, but gradually he is shown more footage and in turn admits that he had gone into the alley in the hope of seeing her peeing, and he does get aroused by seeing girls pee.   That opening credit clip was another occurrence from his phone a month earlier where he'd interrupted a couple of girls peeing in an alleyway.

Throughout his detention he is adamant he never placed his cock in her mouth.  He submits very keenly to the DNA tests of clothing and she provides swabs too.  The programme confirms there were traces of 'male DNA' found, but nothing to prove it was his.   However in the video clips from his phone he is quite intrusive - telling the girls they have nice pussies and arses, asking them to show more, refusing to leave or stop looking when they request it, and offering money or weed to them.  He tells this particular lady he has a big cock.

The outcome - and remember this is a real life documentary - is that he admits to having indecent voyeuristic clips on his phone (including an underage girl's photo) but denies the charge of oral rape.  Crown Prosecution Service put the case to court and he was voted guilty of rape by 11 of the 12 jury - and sentenced to 12 years in prison, plus life on the sex offenders' register.

 

Now - the questions that programme raises....   His modus operandi wasn't that much different from the things we may be tempted to do.  Late night city walkabouts where people may be drunk.  Looking in alleyways where he thought girls may be peeing.  Maybe walking innocently, but actually changing direction when seeing a particular person.  He was definitely harassing them, filming with his phone with light on, refusing to leave them and offering money to them.

There was no footage of anything that happened in the alley - CCTV from the streets either side of the time they entered and left the alley - and some of his phone footage shown on the programme of his conversation / dispute with her.  She is clearly peeing and tells him so, only a stream is shown. He tells her he has a big cock, he offers her money or weed, says she's not a prostitute.  It could be there's more shown than was suitable for TV broadcast.  No DNA evidence of his - could the male DNA traces be due to someone kissing her that evening?

He was clearly a predator and disrespectful in the way he treated people, spoke to them and wouldn't respect his victims wishes to leave them.  But from the programme as edited and presented, the evidence of him carrying out that rape was not made apparent.  The police, CPS and jury however were sufficiently convinced.

[Kupar 12,423]

5 minutes ago, gldenwetgoose said:

If you're here to read about an arousing Pee related programme, this isn't it.  But I would recommend watching this one...    It was incredibly uncomfortable viewing, and a bit of a wake up call.

Last night in the UK, Channel 4 showed a new episode of the documentary '24 Hours In Police Custody' with the episode called 'The Night Prowler'.   The programme is a real life police documentary, filmed in Luton, Bedfordshire with the premise being that under UK law a person is arrested on suspicion of having committed a crime can be detained for 24 hours to gather evidence for prosecution.

So, last night's episode featured a young guy who's seen in the opening credits walking through a city at night and making a selfie video of himself talking.  The camera work is very shaky, and in the opening credits is a girl talking 'we're having a wee, will you turn off that torch'....   Instantly of course I pricked my ears up.  Although there isn't really anything visually shown.

Anyway - as soon as the titles have rolled, the programme cuts to the victim and bodycam footage.   An intoxicated lady who's been refused entry into a nightclub, and instead has gone into an alleyway just next to it.  When she emerges she's extremely distressed and the club door staff look after her until police arrive.  She reports that the guy has placed his cock in her mouth.  Using local CCTV police identify the guy entering the alley after her and leaving in a different direction, they then track him and an hour or so later he's arrested on suspicion of rape.

The programme then shows the interviews with him taking place over his 24 hours of detention and in between, police obtaining CCTV footage and clips from his phone.   In interview he starts being completely innocent and upset, but gradually he is shown more footage and in turn admits that he had gone into the alley in the hope of seeing her peeing, and he does get aroused by seeing girls pee.   That opening credit clip was another occurrence from his phone a month earlier where he'd interrupted a couple of girls peeing in an alleyway.

Throughout his detention he is adamant he never placed his cock in her mouth.  He submits very keenly to the DNA tests of clothing and she provides swabs too.  The programme confirms there were traces of 'male DNA' found, but nothing to prove it was his.   However in the video clips from his phone he is quite intrusive - telling the girls they have nice pussies and arses, asking them to show more, refusing to leave or stop looking when they request it, and offering money or weed to them.  He tells this particular lady he has a big cock.

The outcome - and remember this is a real life documentary - is that he admits to having indecent voyeuristic clips on his phone (including an underage girl's photo) but denies the charge of oral rape.  Crown Prosecution Service put the case to court and he was voted guilty by 11 of the 12 jury - and sentenced to 12 years in prison, plus life on the sex offenders' register.

 

Now - the questions that programme raises....   His modus operandi wasn't that much different from the things we may be tempted to do.  Late night city walkabouts where people may be drunk.  Looking in alleyways where he thought girls may be peeing.  Maybe walking innocently, but actually changing direction when seeing a particular person.  He was definitely harassing them, filming with his phone with light on, refusing to leave them and offering money to them.

There was no footage of anything that happened in the alley - CCTV from the streets either side of the time they entered and left the alley - and some of his phone footage shown on the programme of his conversation / dispute with her.  She is clearly peeing and tells him so, only a stream is shown. He tells her he has a big cock, he offers her money or weed, says she's no a prostitute.  It could be there's more shown than was suitable for TV broadcast.  No DNA evidence of his - could the male DNA traces be due to someone kissing her that evening?

He was clearly a predator and disrespectful in the way he treated people, spoke to them and wouldn't respect his victims wishes to leave them.  But from the programme as edited and presented, the evidence of him carrying out that rape was not made apparent.  The police, CPS and jury however were sufficiently convinced.

Wow. Thanks for taking the trouble to describe that Goose. Quite eye-opening.

Edited December 11, 2023 by Kupar

[gldenwetgoose 20,253]

One other point I should mention - if you are going to watch it with anyone who knows but doesn't understand, or disapproves of our kink (and in particular voyeuristic aspects of it) - then this programme doesn't present us in a great light.

Courteous Peefans who would respectfully keep their distance, even keep a lookout to help a peeing girl stay safe, offer words of comfort or whatever...   Could easily be lumped in the same as the guy in this programme.  

[Kupar 12,423]

27 minutes ago, gldenwetgoose said:

One other point I should mention - if you are going to watch it with anyone who knows but doesn't understand, or disapproves of our kink (and in particular voyeuristic aspects of it) - then this programme doesn't present us in a great light.

Courteous Peefans who would respectfully keep their distance, even keep a lookout to help a peeing girl stay safe, offer words of comfort or whatever...   Could easily be lumped in the same as the guy in this programme.  

Disappointing 😞 

[Alfresco 11,002]

On 12/11/2023 at 8:24 AM, gldenwetgoose said:

If you're here to read about an arousing Pee related programme, this isn't it.  But I would recommend watching this one...    It was incredibly uncomfortable viewing, and a bit of a wake up call.

Last night in the UK, Channel 4 showed a new episode of the documentary '24 Hours In Police Custody' with the episode called 'The Night Prowler'.   The programme is a real life police documentary, filmed in Luton, Bedfordshire with the premise being that under UK law a person arrested on suspicion of having committed a crime can be detained for 24 hours to gather evidence for prosecution.

So, last night's episode featured a young guy who's seen in the opening credits walking through a city at night and making a selfie video of himself talking.  The camera work is very shaky, and in the opening credits is a girl talking 'we're having a wee, will you turn off that torch'....   Instantly of course I pricked my ears up.  Although there isn't really anything visually shown.

Anyway - as soon as the titles have rolled, the programme cuts to the victim and bodycam footage.   An intoxicated lady who's been refused entry into a nightclub, and instead has gone into an alleyway just next to it.  When she emerges she's extremely distressed and the club door staff look after her until police arrive.  She reports that the guy has placed his cock in her mouth.  Using local CCTV police identify the guy entering the alley after her and leaving in a different direction, they then track him and an hour or so later he's arrested on suspicion of rape.

The programme then shows the interviews with him taking place over his 24 hours of detention and in between, police obtaining CCTV footage and clips from his phone.   In interview he starts being completely innocent and upset, but gradually he is shown more footage and in turn admits that he had gone into the alley in the hope of seeing her peeing, and he does get aroused by seeing girls pee.   That opening credit clip was another occurrence from his phone a month earlier where he'd interrupted a couple of girls peeing in an alleyway.

Throughout his detention he is adamant he never placed his cock in her mouth.  He submits very keenly to the DNA tests of clothing and she provides swabs too.  The programme confirms there were traces of 'male DNA' found, but nothing to prove it was his.   However in the video clips from his phone he is quite intrusive - telling the girls they have nice pussies and arses, asking them to show more, refusing to leave or stop looking when they request it, and offering money or weed to them.  He tells this particular lady he has a big cock.

The outcome - and remember this is a real life documentary - is that he admits to having indecent voyeuristic clips on his phone (including an underage girl's photo) but denies the charge of oral rape.  Crown Prosecution Service put the case to court and he was voted guilty of rape by 11 of the 12 jury - and sentenced to 12 years in prison, plus life on the sex offenders' register.

 

Now - the questions that programme raises....   His modus operandi wasn't that much different from the things we may be tempted to do.  Late night city walkabouts where people may be drunk.  Looking in alleyways where he thought girls may be peeing.  Maybe walking innocently, but actually changing direction when seeing a particular person.  He was definitely harassing them, filming with his phone with light on, refusing to leave them and offering money to them.

There was no footage of anything that happened in the alley - CCTV from the streets either side of the time they entered and left the alley - and some of his phone footage shown on the programme of his conversation / dispute with her.  She is clearly peeing and tells him so, only a stream is shown. He tells her he has a big cock, he offers her money or weed, says she's not a prostitute.  It could be there's more shown than was suitable for TV broadcast.  No DNA evidence of his - could the male DNA traces be due to someone kissing her that evening?

He was clearly a predator and disrespectful in the way he treated people, spoke to them and wouldn't respect his victims wishes to leave them.  But from the programme as edited and presented, the evidence of him carrying out that rape was not made apparent.  The police, CPS and jury however were sufficiently convinced.

This is definitely worrying that (as far as we know), he didn't actually commit the crime of oral rape, but the police, jury and court found him guilty.   Also very worrying that just a girl deciding to call the police and make the accusation would be enough to potentially get the person in prison until charged.

There are some other factors in there that need to be considered though - The key one being that his attitude was horrendous and even if he didn't commit oral rape, he did harass the girl significantly.   If a person instead is polite and maybe enjoys the view discretely, then the girl in generally going to either be not bothered about being seen, or will assume that the encounter is an unfortunate result of her decision to pee in public.   The key thing is always to take onboard the feedback of the lady peeing.   i.e. if she is chatty and happy, then she is not too bothered.  If she is trying her best to hide and asks the guy to go away, then the guy absolutely should respect that and move on quickly.

Another factor here is that he filmed her.   That does two things.  Firstly it shows that he was trying to watch her and wanted to retain a record of it and secondly the video provides evidence of the nature of the engagement - i.e. that he was being overbearing in his attitude and downright offensive to the girl and didn't back down when the girl clearly told him to do so.

The girl in this circumstance probably only called the police because of his attitude.  Most women wouldn't call the police after being caught peeing because that would mean they have to admit that they were peeing in public in the first place.  She must have been seriously bothered by the guy in order that she felt the need to report it.

Still, it does all point to the need to be very careful and of course respectful.

 

 

[gldenwetgoose 20,253]

Totally agreed @Alfresco - the way the programme portrayed it, he effectively incriminated himself with the several videos on his phone.

From all the impressions the programme gave, it was an unknown whether he did expose himself and subject her to the oral rape. Certainly the police seemed uncertain which way the trial would go - which suggests there wasn’t a video clip of it. 

The lady was extremely distressed when the police attended immediately after the event.  (It’s possible there was more footage - but certainly the programme gave the impression that there wasn’t).

The impression was that the case was going to court despite a gap in clear evidence. 

Edited December 12, 2023 by gldenwetgoose

[Alfresco 11,002]

So the moral of the story is be careful, stay safe, respect other people and listen to anything they say - leave if they are not happy, don't do anything to intimidate anyone and don't go being intrusive or filming.

If you happen to see something from a distance or whilst walking past then all should be fine, but if you are an idiot and intimidate people or be excessively intrusive to someone who is trying to be hidden then you are probably asking for trouble.

[Paulypeeps 4,985]

Is Netflix mainstream? Captain Fall had an interesting scene where the captain was dreaming about sex and being asked to pee while on the job, and he wakes to find that he has wet the bed in his sleep. It is at the start of episode 6.

[Alfresco 11,002]

From Graham Norton, Kate Winslet tells how she did the pee scene in Holy Smoke and they go on to talk about shewees.

 

[MC Cumzy 1,382]

Light desperation scene in Superman and Lois Season 3 Episode 12

16:17 

One character runs into her house, her daughter's all "Where have you been? I need a lift to work" The mum's all "Fine, I just have to pee real quick" They discuss some drama, while the mum is all fidgety, before the daughter decides she's going to walk to work and the mum runs off screen.

That's a bit of a generalisation but I would genuinely recommend giving the show a watch, Season 3 just dropped on IPlayer this past weekend