Pee Sensei 288 Posted May 30, 2022 Share Posted May 30, 2022 Here's a very theoretical scenario: imagine a crowded place, no matter if its out- or indoors, but it only has one toilet. Queue is long but you manage to wait through it. The toilet lady tells you that there are two stalls: the first one costs lets say $1000 to use the second one is free but there are multiple cameras planted Which one would you use? What is the financial limit that would make you choose the camera toilet? Does it matter if you knew the image of the camera is closed circuited back to the others also at same place or if it's streaming straight to public internet? Quote Link to post
Eliminature 5,108 Posted May 30, 2022 Share Posted May 30, 2022 I'd have to choose the free one with the cameras. I simply don't have that kind of money. Purely a financial situation for me. I'd have to suck up any voyeurs who would post my footage to the internet and trolls who would shame me for it. 1 Quote Link to post
Alfresco 11,009 Posted May 30, 2022 Share Posted May 30, 2022 I wouldn't pay any amount to avoid the cameras. I very very rarely pay to use a toilet at all - if there is a charge to use a public toilet then I would find somewhere outside instead. So in this case, my question would be whether I would enjoy peeing for others to view (which the exhibitionist in me would quite like) or would I go outside to be more discrete. However, (and I know you said it was hypothetical), I would never bother joining the queue in the first place. 1 1 Quote Link to post
Peewee123 1,111 Posted May 30, 2022 Share Posted May 30, 2022 I would leave and pee somewhere else. 1 1 1 Quote Link to post
Eliminature 5,108 Posted May 30, 2022 Share Posted May 30, 2022 4 minutes ago, Peewee123 said: I would leave and pee somewhere else. Yes. Probably the best idea. 1 Quote Link to post
Bacardi 9,194 Posted May 30, 2022 Share Posted May 30, 2022 I dont have the money and refuse to pee on camera for anyone so I guess I'm leaving the venue and finding a more private place anywhere else lol. 2 1 Quote Link to post
oliver2 3,906 Posted May 30, 2022 Share Posted May 30, 2022 1 hour ago, Alfresco said: I wouldn't pay any amount to avoid the cameras. I very very rarely pay to use a toilet at all - if there is a charge to use a public toilet then I would find somewhere outside instead. So in this case, my question would be whether I would enjoy peeing for others to view (which the exhibitionist in me would quite like) or would I go outside to be more discrete. However, (and I know you said it was hypothetical), I would never bother joining the queue in the first place. Remove some of the cameras from the voyeur-loo and make a voyeur-wall-and-shrubs, and anyone who wants not to be voyeurised can use the other walls and shrubs 🙃 Quote Link to post
Ms. Tito 2,043 Posted May 31, 2022 Share Posted May 31, 2022 5 hours ago, bungholio69 said: Alternative option: Reject humanity and just pee in the middle of the crowd. Based Quote Link to post
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.