Could pee ever be more acceptable in society?

[Admin 14,791]

Pee in movies or literature is generally avoided and as a rule; people would view an interest in pee as weird. However, arguably people are becoming more 'open' and with the development of the internet, more and more weirder porn is becoming available. Do you think it's possible pee porn or seeing girls pee will become less of a weird interest or taboo subject in the future? Especially with sites such as this which prove it's such a popular fetish.

[F.W 5,734]

That is a very good point.Its like saying,"what is perversion"?I reckon 99% of males would enjoy watching a girl urinate,but due to "normal" behaviour,no-one would openly admit their sexual desire,which is a shame to me.On here,we all are anonymous,not through shame,but if our true identity became known,we would be stigmatised by our peers."Normal" sex,is man-woman,erection,in vagina,ejaculate,go to sleep.Anything outside of that is regarded as "Perverse"and must be punished.I must admit,i do like my fetish to be just this side of "normal",whereas "scat" is the wrong side.

I would hope that our fetish could be considered less "weird".But it will always be a bit extreme for a lot of people ,who are not as sexually imaginative as us!

[steve25805 126,156]

I've always suspected that some interest in peeing is far more widespread than has been traditionally assumed. But many are totally in the closet, locking the interest away in their own private sexual fantasy world. I suspect quite a few - taught to regard pee as dirty and disgusting and immersed in percieved societal norms and taboos - are actually in denial.

I think that when it comes to watching others pee, the interest is borderline mainstream in the sense that a large majority of people would be interested in seeing a sexually attractive person pee. Many would never admit it openly though, or - if they do - would only admit it in private with selected sexual partners. But it is worth bearing in mind that most children do - given the chance - exhibit an interest in watching the opposite gender pee, at an age when they are too young to have absorbed sexual taboos and notions of norms and perversions. I suspect that they very much still do as adults, but are far more likely to pretend otherwise. Chances are, though, that for most it is not a primary interest that they ever think of actively seeking out, unlike many of us here.

When it comes to going beyond watching - wetting, peeing in public, golden showers, etc - I think our interest still is a minority one. But I think it is a much larger minority than most of the prudes or narrowminds out there would like to believe.

[ironbladderman 38]

I read a discussion on this a few months back, one of the main concerns would be how clean it will be (paraphrasing from what I remember). I guess some people would get grossed out by it to sum it up. As Steve said prudes and narrowminds would keep this fetish from being more accepted. With comedy it helps people laugh if its relatable, so there would have to be something that draws in other than the visual and audio content.

[Paulypeeps 5,290]

I think it is just an education thing, people will become more understanding of both their own desires and those of others as they get to know more. I don't think that my friends would automatically think that wetting was acceptable - but because they know that I do it and it is quite innocuous they find it is OK and quite a good source of humour.

[MissPiss 1,027]

I don't think it's viewed as weird at all! Way more mainstream than farts, diapers, or other fetishes like that. But then you are asking a girl from the San Francisco Bay Area where people are so open minded. . . . lol

[Peegirl91 17]

I think pee is already fairly accepted. I've seen (totally neutral, not portraying it is being sickening or anything) references to pee fetishes in non-adult media and a few films and in porn, it's seemingly becoming more and more common. In the coming years, I think (or at least I hope!) pee will be just as accepted as some of the more mainstream fetishes.

[alien37 58]

Egwalrus--I had the same frustrating experience with "Deep Inside Annie Sprinkle" :)

[steve25805 126,156]

When the internet first came into being (14.4 dial up connections on a good day) sex was also a major factor its popularity. Studies showed that the words searched for most were thinks like "sex" "nude" and the like.

Certainly true in my case. The only reason I went online was to access pee porn, having heard that porn of every variety was available online in abundance and often for free. And indeed, for my first few months online, accessing porn was pretty much all I went online for. It was actually via google searches for porn that I stumbled across pee porn forums eventually, and from there gained the idea of seeking out non-sexual forums on issues that interest me as well. And as I made friends on these forums I increasingly used the internet as a medium of communication too. So my internet activity has greatly widened with the passage of time.

But the porn was what first attracted me in the first place. Without that, I would probably never have bothered.

[lugia 228]

It's inevitable that pee- and pretty much every other deviant from traditional sex- is going to be considered less weird and taboo. Consider all the categories listed in Clips4sale; it's a freaking encyclopedia. Peeing is more at the forefront than most of the others, however. Again, consider the popular Eroprofile; "pissing" has a category, despite not being sex. "Feet/foot fetish" (for instance) doesn't. As a side note, I'm actually somewhat troubled by this progressing trend. If opening Pandora's box meant releasing pee porn in earnest, but let out a ton of other bizarre stuff as well, I'd rather keep the box shut. Sometimes, knowing too much about humanity makes me cringe.

Oh, well. Too late now. We might as well take advantage of the trend where we can.

[likesToLick 10,216]

Things are definitely changing. When I was a teenager even something as natural as cunnilingus was considered a perversion. Now you can see it depicted on broadcast TV. (Just this week a rerun of "waking the dead" featured a woman having her pussy licked on a kitchen bench.)

On almost every supermarket checkout you can buy women's magazines that give instructions for blowjobs. They don't even carry an adults only rating.

My generation is full of prudes. Open minded types like me are the exception, or at least a minority. I don't think the young people who grew up with the Internet will ever be so prissy.

[F.W 5,734]

I find society very hypocritical,when that "50 shades of grey"was the rage a few years ago,kind of female porno i guess,it was on open display in bookshops,women went on tv talking about it.Entire sections of the news were discussing how racy it was,even a girl i know showed me an article that instructed women how to MASTURBATE more effectively!All well and good-if youre a woman that is..In the same newspaper that i read how sexy reading that book was for a woman who never had an orgasm,and how it improved her sex life,(why we needed to know her sexual problems i dont know..),there was an article by a WOMAN criticising the way we MEN view internet porn,and how shes disgusted by finding her husband viewing it,and wanting it banned?Do we MEN want our "mucky books" on display in bookshops,do we sit around in groups discussing our latest orgasms,NO we do not!Why is porn ok,only when its aimed at women?Only this week in UK weve banned a guy coming from US because he tells men how to "pick up girls".Imagine if a man wrote a book for men,featuring peeing on them,or anally fucking them.There would be outrage!

[ironbladderman 38]

I find society very hypocritical,when that "50 shades of grey"was the rage a few years ago,kind of female porno i guess,it was on open display in bookshops,women went on tv talking about it.Entire sections of the news were discussing how racy it was,even a girl i know showed me an article that instructed women how to MASTURBATE more effectively!All well and good-if youre a woman that is..In the same newspaper that i read how sexy reading that book was for a woman who never had an orgasm,and how it improved her sex life,(why we needed to know her sexual problems i dont know..),there was an article by a WOMAN criticising the way we MEN view internet porn,and how shes disgusted by finding her husband viewing it,and wanting it banned?Do we MEN want our "mucky books" on display in bookshops,do we sit around in groups discussing our latest orgasms,NO we do not!Why is porn ok,only when its aimed at women?Only this week in UK weve banned a guy coming from US because he tells men how to "pick up girls".Imagine if a man wrote a book for men,featuring peeing on them,or anally fucking them.There would be outrage!

This is in the UK? wow sounded like the USA, because it is the same over here.