Not quite sure where this fits

[Adyguy6970 878]

I'm not quite sure where this fits but I recently came across an article about the actor Jamie Dornan wearing a 'wee bag' in the 50 Shades of Grey film.  Here's the link to it:

http://www.eonline.com/uk/news/910846/jamie-dornan-wore-quite-a-big-wee-bag-to-shoot-fifty-shades-freed-sex-scenes

I can't quite picture what it would like but it sounds interesting.  It's impossible to not wonder whether he used it for its intended purpose at some stage during the filming though!

 

 

[Sophie 24,413]

I don't think this means what you think it means.

[F.W 5,734]

Maybe its the Scottish "wee".Meaning small.Like Och aye,a big wee bag...a colloquialism no more.

[Adyguy6970 878]

Thanks sophie & fannywatcher.  I think this article more or less clears matters up:

http://www.marieclaire.co.uk/news/celebrity-news/jamie-dornan-wee-bag-575823

To me that implies it wasn't a 'wee bag' in the Scottish sense of 'wee' but something fairly copious - one might hope caoable of holding a decent amount of urine.  

[Sophie 24,413]

They also call them modesty pouches.

And think about it, why would a hollywood actor wear a bag to pee in... while filming a sex scene? It's not like he can't just get up and go to the bathroom. 

It's not what you are thinking of.

[Scot_Lover 1,878]

Lol, in this case a wee bag is a small bag, Mary has a small handbag and that's how she tells the difference. These things are what's used to tie around his old fella, so he looks naked, but isn't. 

 

[F.W 5,734]

Does anyone watch this crap anyway?Because the problem I have with films like" fifty shades",or "sex and the city",and such like,is that it is mass market pornography.Because its basically made for a female audience,women decide its ok for THEM to watch it for "titillation",and they run features in the papers,do interviews on the news etc,but many of the women that go watch it,will be the ones crying on about how the men in their lives are always watching porn or ogling other women.Or screaming about "page 3 girls.(which i think are stupid too by the way).But i cant remember ever seeing someone like Tera Patrick being interviewed on BBC News about how she took 8 inches up her bum,or does she actually like the taste of semen.Double standards.

Edited February 21, 2018 by fannywatcher

[Brutus 2,206]

On 2/20/2018 at 9:27 PM, fannywatcher said:

Does anyone watch this crap anyway?Because the problem I have with films like" fifty shades",or "sex and the city",and such like,is that it is mass market pornography.Because its basically made for a female audience,women decide its ok for THEM to watch it for "titillation",and they run features in the papers,do interviews on the news etc,but many of the women that go watch it,will be the ones crying on about how the men in their lives are always watching porn or ogling other women.Or screaming about "page 3 girls.(which i think are stupid too by the way).But i cant remember ever seeing someone like Tera Patrick being interviewed on BBC News about how she took 8 inches up her bum,or does she actually like the taste of semen.Double standards.

Oh yes, they make a ton of money, so women are definitely watching. You're correct, it is a double standard regarding the acceptance of each gender's preferred "porn". Romance novels and shows/movies like the ones you mentioned are like porn for women, insofar as the sexual undertone enjoyment that only they get from it, and it's considered empowering. But, men's porn is considered objectification, even though the men in women's romance material are often bad boy objects of money and sex, of which only about 1 percent of men can actually live up to.

[Adyguy6970 878]

Yes it's amazing how double standards sometimes kick in isn't it?  

Edited February 26, 2018 by Adyguy6970