Pee porn actors

[chubbyjack 229]

Do porn performers get paid extra to do pee scenes. Solo and golden showers and drinking?

Can they say no to a pee scene if they are not into it?

 

[MC Cumzy 1,603]

10 minutes ago, chubbyjack said:

Do porn performers get paid extra to do pee scenes. Solo and golden showers and drinking?

Can they say no to a pee scene if they are not into it?

 

Don't know about the first part but I'd assume they would be able to say no to a pee scene as otherwise it would be breaking the rules of consent

[Kirby23 927]

This is an interesting question, and I'll admit, not something I'd given much thought to previously.

I think it would depend on a couple of factors. First among these is to determine how unusual or "out there" peeing content would be considered. In the mid-nineties, it was pretty unusual, and therefore probably carried a premium. But as all different kinds of porn became more ubiquitous, including fetish-oriented content, it probably started to carry less of a premium, as more of this type of content was introduced.

Another related factor to consider is the simple concept of supply and demand. As more supply becomes available, doing pee-related videos probably began to carry less of a premium. E.g. more people were probably willing to do it. As far as "fringe" type fetish content goes, I think most would consider pee pretty tame. Think about an otherwise ambivalent actress deciding whether to do pee content versus, say, scat, or even something involving violence. I'd suggest the latter two examples would likely carry much more of a premium since fewer people would be willing to do it.

Next, I would also put out there that it may depend whether the pee act was planned or spontaneous. There's definitely a difference between a video whose point is pee versus a video focusing more on the sex act, and then one of the participants spontaneously needs to pee. Incidentally, the latter (unplanned) I find particularly hot. In a video where the pee act was unplanned, I'd guess no one's getting paid extra for that.

I'm sure there are probably other factors that play in, but these are a few that I can immediately think of.

[chubbyjack 229]

53 minutes ago, Kirby23 said:

This is an interesting question, and I'll admit, not something I'd given much thought to previously.

I think it would depend on a couple of factors. First among these is to determine how unusual or "out there" peeing content would be considered. In the mid-nineties, it was pretty unusual, and therefore probably carried a premium. But as all different kinds of porn became more ubiquitous, including fetish-oriented content, it probably started to carry less of a premium, as more of this type of content was introduced.

Another related factor to consider is the simple concept of supply and demand. As more supply becomes available, doing pee-related videos probably began to carry less of a premium. E.g. more people were probably willing to do it. As far as "fringe" type fetish content goes, I think most would consider pee pretty tame. Think about an otherwise ambivalent actress deciding whether to do pee content versus, say, scat, or even something involving violence. I'd suggest the latter two examples would likely carry much more of a premium since fewer people would be willing to do it.

Next, I would also put out there that it may depend whether the pee act was planned or spontaneous. There's definitely a difference between a video whose point is pee versus a video focusing more on the sex act, and then one of the participants spontaneously needs to pee. Incidentally, the latter (unplanned) I find particularly hot. In a video where the pee act was unplanned, I'd guess no one's getting paid extra for that.

I'm sure there are probably other factors that play in, but these are a few that I can immediately think of.

Thanks.  There's a big difference between simply peeing on camera and being pissed on especially on the face and drinking it

[Kiwi Watcher 9]

I imagine most porn flicks have a script of some sort even if it just reads "she stands and pisses on the floor" so I think the actors will know what they are getting into when they start filming. It's kind of like nude scenes in a mainstream movie where the script reads "the camera shows her bare ass as she walks into the bathroom" or "as he walks towards the camera we see his penis" . I think actors who claim they didn't know they had to do a nude scene are full of shit. And I have the same feeling about porn actors who "don't know there is a pee scene".

I doubt they get paid extra for it as they should know in advance what they are doing.

That said, I personally do not enjoy porn with piss scenes in it when they are made purely because the fansly or manyvids creator knows men will pay and is just doing it for money. It's much better to me if the creator actually enjoys a little naughty pissing. And there are plenty of them to be found on Reddit 

[Kirby23 927]

1 hour ago, Kiwi Watcher said:

I imagine most porn flicks have a script of some sort even if it just reads "she stands and pisses on the floor" so I think the actors will know what they are getting into when they start filming.

Yeah, I'd tend to agree. I remember seeing an "outtake" at one point in the past, of a "conventional" porn video where the actress was supposed to pee somewhere like 20 minutes into the video. But apparently she'd already been holding, and started peeing too early, like 10 minutes in. The male actor was totally caught by surprise, because it was essentially unscripted. I remember he had a look of surprise on his face, but he basically just kept going, even though she was peeing. It was kind of hot, because you knew it was more or less accidental.

[Kirby23 927]

A lot of this discussion assumes that we're talking about conventional / scripted porn. I'd venture to guess there's no premium being put on pee-related content in amateur porn, like a lot of what you might find on PornHub, YouPorn, even Reddit, for example.

[PissDude 479]

I've wondered if they have some sort of standard for ensuring the women are full enough for a good scene. Do they just take their word that the woman has to go, or do they make her drink a certain amount of water and hold it for a couple hours beforehand?

[Kiwi Watcher 9]

13 hours ago, PissDude said:

I've wondered if they have some sort of standard for ensuring the women are full enough for a good scene. Do they just take their word that the woman has to go, or do they make her drink a certain amount of water and hold it for a couple hours beforehand?

I reckon they probably make her drink a lot. Plus, like any movie, there will be multiple takes done. So if first take not quite right wait a few hours and try again 😂

[MC Cumzy 1,603]

On 10/16/2024 at 2:05 PM, PissDude said:

I've wondered if they have some sort of standard for ensuring the women are full enough for a good scene. Do they just take their word that the woman has to go, or do they make her drink a certain amount of water and hold it for a couple hours beforehand?

I know they do with Sneakypee, Bound2burst and ALSscans. So it's likely that'll be the case for a lot of places

[Kirby23 927]

19 minutes ago, MC Cumzy said:

I know they do with Sneakypee, Bound2burst and ALSscans. So it's likely that'll be the case for a lot of places

Can you elaborate on this at all? First, how do you know these sites have put these standards in place? Second, any idea what their standards / rules are?

[MC Cumzy 1,603]

7 minutes ago, Kirby23 said:

Can you elaborate on this at all? First, how do you know these sites have put these standards in place? Second, any idea what their standards / rules are?

To answer the first, I know just because it's been either shown or talked about in videos. 

Don't know about the second

[Kirby23 927]

3 minutes ago, MC Cumzy said:

To answer the first, I know just because it's been either shown or talked about in videos. 

Don't know about the second

Thanks for the quick reply. I guess I'm a little surprised by this. I just don't see how they'd practically be able to set standards for ensuring someone has to pee... forcing them to drink fluid, etc. Just doesn't seem like something that would be easily enforceable. 

Seems to me like it would be sufficient to say "Let us know when you have to pee and we'll start filming."

Kind of like with an ultrasound. Women are given the instruction "Come with a full bladder" but I don't think they're told how much to drink. 

Obviously I could be mistaken.

[gldenwetgoose 21,214]

In reading the question, I'm sort of sensing the thought that a random person would be booked to walk in a room, and perform a porn shoot.   Without any real knowledge of how they'll react, how full their bladder will be - how forcefully they'll pee or even whether they'll gel with the other actors.  Just a stranger replying to an advert and walking straight in off the street?

But in reality I'd expect it's going to be a lot more of a gradual thing...    some production staff will have worked with certain actors in the past and know their capabilities.  And those actors will in turn have worked with other actors and know them.   Lots of pre-discussions and story ideas will have been floated about, lots of chat and planning.   Then when it comes to it, the actors will have been with the camera people and producers all through the drinking and filling up, maybe big gaps between cuts on the movies.

You don't imagine the camera person zoomed in at that moment just by chance - and you don't imaging that actor just happened to luckily be on that spot?   All of it is most likely to be planned, and there will not be any big surprises in terms of volume of pee.

(Of course more clips these days are self filmed and produced. And that may be a different matter altogether...)