In the eye of the beholder

[greedyneedygirl 4,156]

They say that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, one man's poison...etc. I've been having an on-line discussion about 'beauty', within the context of porn, and in peeing clips. Q. Do you have to fancy a woman to get turned on, is there such a thing as sexual allure without being classically beautiful or pretty? Is this a case in point? (see clip)

https://www.eroprofile.com/m/videos/view/POV-Super-hot-fun-hippy-chick-goes-for-a-piss-in-her-VERY-overlooked-garden-as-she-becomes-Miss-Waterfall-again

[LovesToWet 3,802]

I don't think you have to fancy a woman/man to be sexually aroused by them. I've watched videos from all different shapes n sizes of women and found them exciting as it's the act/scenario I get turned on by.

Edited September 5, 2022 by LovesToWet

[gldenwetgoose 21,496]

Great question - and one which will hopefully provoke lots of intelligent and respectful debate.    The 'industry' does like to tell us what we should fantasise over doesn't it.  Once upon a time Marilyn Monroe was for many the hottest woman on the planet, and how times have changed.

I guess for me personally the question can be answered on several levels...

- In the example of that clip, the main things I think I was turned on by were that I knew from the title it was a lady peeing clip, and I knew it was going to be outdoor. Then she expressed her desperation before actually peeing.  All of those things related to peeing worked together to ensure I was turned on by the clip.

- Was I turned on by her?   Well, had I watched the clip without preconceptions, I would have become turned on by much of the same things.  Probably turned on when she started to express desperation - not turned on by her being in discomfort, but by a confident attitude to express it to the camera.  Again I'm probably more turned on by her actions than her appearance.  Sexual allure???    For me sexual allure isn't all about how she eats a banana or walks in killer stillhettos.

- Did I fancy her?    There was absolutely nothing about her appearance that said no to me.   I'd like to get to know her, chat and see how she compared conversationally, what sense of humour she shared.  But it's entirely possible.   Body image and other stereotypes aren't critical factors there.   Would I look at her from 100 yards and want to jump in bed?  Probably not.  But that's not me anyway.

 

[LovesToWet 3,802]

@gldenwetgoose perfectly expressed Mr Goose. Its exactly how I felt but I couldn't word it like you did

[WetDreamer 22,139]

For me, what is attractive about the clip is that the person and their situation look real.

She is pretty and watching gives a feeling of voyeurism.

The need to wee and the act is not made up.

It  is a turn on.

 

[Crazypdog081 113]

Looks don't matter when it comes to peeing, but to be honest I think she's lovely. There's something about British Women peeing, hence why I also love Sneaky Pee video, she reminds me of the Ladies on there, they may not be models by the world's standards but they're so passionate, kinky and can piss harder and stronger than most men

Edited September 8, 2022 by Crazypdog081

[Takashi96 1,076]

On 9/5/2022 at 2:57 AM, greedyneedygirl said:

They say that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, one man's poison...etc. I've been having an on-line discussion about 'beauty', within the context of porn, and in peeing clips. Q. Do you have to fancy a woman to get turned on, is there such a thing as sexual allure without being classically beautiful or pretty? Is this a case in point? (see clip)

https://www.eroprofile.com/m/videos/view/POV-Super-hot-fun-hippy-chick-goes-for-a-piss-in-her-VERY-overlooked-garden-as-she-becomes-Miss-Waterfall-again

I love this question! It brings up a phenomenon I noticed a few years ago when I was watching some vintage porn. I love vintage porn. But one of things that was really strange about it in the beginning was how there was no consistent beauty standard for getting work or becoming popular. Most of the talent in those films were sort of average looking people. However,  they, along with a handful of beautiful people, and a handful of less attractive looking people were willing to fuck on camera. And it's fascinating to watch people fuck who probably wouldn't fuck off camera. Still, I don't think audiences back then really cared or even noticed. They were just there for the fucking, the weird settings and the craziness onscreen. 

And that's how I feel about piss porn. I came hard to this clip, even before you posted it. And I'm not even sure what the specific thing was that turned me on. But I chose to cum to it over other clips with girls who looked like models. I don't even find that woman particularly attractive but I connected to her in the clip. 

If you look at the early piss porn from 20 years ago produced by fetish studios compared to that produced my mainstream porn studios there's a huge difference in appeal, at least to me.

Sure, mainstream porn stars peeing on camera is hot for all the obvious reasons. But not as hot as the plain looking English girl who's obviously getting off from pissing all over the floor. 

Edited September 9, 2022 by Takashi96
Spelling