Snippet of Piss Fetish Documentary

[Eliminature 5,209]

This might be of interest to some of us. I'm not big on watching television so I never saw this when it was first aired. There is also some footage of a man peeing in a wood which some of us might enjoy. I kind of want to meet this guy and have him watch me pee too!

If I have posted this in the wrong topic, I'd be very grateful if the admins/moderators could put it in the correct place. I really wasn't sure where it should go!

 

 

[lameduck58 321]

You need to reach out to Hamster245 on here, I am sure he can tell you how this all came about

[Eliminature 5,209]

What say you, @Hamster245? 

[Hamster245 590]

5 hours ago, Eliminature said:

What say you, @Hamster245? 

The man is me... Interviewed and pissing in the trees whilst Chloe watched me.  

I was approached by the producers who found me via a 'meet me' advert on cascades website. After a lot of discussion it was arranged back in 2015. 

[Eliminature 5,209]

8 minutes ago, Hamster245 said:

The man is me... Interviewed and pissing in the trees whilst Chloe watched me.  

I was approached by the producers who found me via a 'meet me' advert on cascades website. After a lot of discussion it was arranged back in 2015. 

Oh well, I guess this guy has kind of seen me peeing, then! 😂

Thank you for admitting this. I hope it didn't embarrass you. I don't mind tellibg you that I find this quite arousing. 👏🏻

[Hamster245 590]

3 minutes ago, Eliminature said:

Oh well, I guess this guy has kind of seen me peeing, then! 😂

Thank you for admitting this. I hope it didn't embarrass you. I don't mind tellibg you that I find this quite arousing. 👏🏻

Yes, I kinda have!  I enjoy your content too!

I'm pleased it has at least one fan, it was a very enjoyable experience for me to pee with a willing watcher.

[gldenwetgoose 21,487]

Yes, kudos @Hamster245 for taking part in the documentary - a brave move.   I hadn't seen that clip before, so maybe there was a little more length to it when broadcast?  

Overall I got the impression that the presenter wasn't particularly receptive to the whole thing - she seemed to give an impression of performing the interview but giving no glimmer of acceptance or interest herself.  Going into it with a closed mind was a shame really.   The piece could have been so different had she taken the opportunity herself to nip behind a tree, hidden by the bushes, to try for an outdoor wee herself. Obviously the cameras wouldn't have shown anything and it wouldn't matter if she'd been pee shy and couldn't do anything.

Then when asking people in the street she seemed more focussed more on the web sharing aspects than the actual peeing outdoors.  After all, the question of 'would you feel comfortable with your partner posting NSFW content on the web' is a very generic topic which could be applied to all sorts of content.  The result again seemed to be more judgemental on the idea of sharing videos than anything to do with peeing (and I can relate to that, also having a partner who doesn't share my passion).

It would have been more interesting had she explored the actual peeing side of it a bit more with the people in the street - or perhaps she did, but didn't present the questions in a way which gave anything positive back.

Still - as I say kudos for taking part in it, and supporting it being brought into the public spotlight even if just for those metaphorical 15 seconds of fame. 

 

[Hamster245 590]

2 hours ago, gldenwetgoose said:

Yes, kudos @Hamster245 for taking part in the documentary - a brave move.   I hadn't seen that clip before, so maybe there was a little more length to it when broadcast?  

No, it was only a short feature series, and I was the only person who took part. What you see broadcast is prettymuch what was said and done. 

2 hours ago, gldenwetgoose said:

Overall I got the impression that the presenter wasn't particularly receptive to the whole thing - she seemed to give an impression of performing the interview but giving no glimmer of acceptance or interest herself.  Going into it with a closed mind was a shame really.   The piece could have been so different had she taken the opportunity herself to nip behind a tree, hidden by the bushes, to try for an outdoor wee herself. Obviously the cameras wouldn't have shown anything and it wouldn't matter if she'd been pee shy and couldn't do anything.

I'm afraid after the edit and final programme, I felt the same. Some of the questions I thought were rather stupid. She oddly had pissed outside quite a lot, even telling me she'd pissed in a taxi cab whilst drunk. When the scenes were filmed at the woods, I pissed first with Chloe looking on. She was thinking about a piss but decided not to do it and so it was left. 

 

2 hours ago, gldenwetgoose said:

Then when asking people in the street she seemed more focussed more on the web sharing aspects than the actual peeing outdoors.  After all, the question of 'would you feel comfortable with your partner posting NSFW content on the web' is a very generic topic which could be applied to all sorts of content.  The result again seemed to be more judgemental on the idea of sharing videos than anything to do with peeing (and I can relate to that, also having a partner who doesn't share my passion).

This is the part I didn't see, produced after I had filmed my bit and I have to say the most disapointing part of the thing for me as it gave a very unfair reaction to the show. In one of the other features a man got his kicks by putting live maggots under his foreskin and at no point did they go in the street and ask people if they thought that was "normal" behaviour. Yet I felt singled out for enjoying a perfectly normal body function being carried out in a less private manor. 

2 hours ago, gldenwetgoose said:

It would have been more interesting had she explored the actual peeing side of it a bit more with the people in the street - or perhaps she did, but didn't present the questions in a way which gave anything positive back.

 

2 hours ago, gldenwetgoose said:

Still - as I say kudos for taking part in it, and supporting it being brought into the public spotlight even if just for those metaphorical 15 seconds of fame. 

I think given the editing, I wouldn't do it again. I enjoyed Chloe watching me go; but the end conclusion for a fetish series was pretty poor. 

 

[Paulypeeps 5,287]

@Hamster245 Well done for coming across well. It is very hard to have such restraint and not say something that the production can jump on and make you seem weird. 

[Hamster245 590]

1 minute ago, Paulypeeps said:

@Hamster245 Well done for coming across well. It is very hard to have such restraint and not say something that the production can jump on and make you seem weird. 

Thanks, I'm pleased that I don't - but then I suppose all of us here understand the fetish don't we.  I certainly think there were weirder fetishes featured. 

[nopjans 1,178]

Chloe is cute. Too bad she didn't join you for a pee.

[Eliminature 5,209]

17 hours ago, Hamster245 said:

She oddly had pissed outside quite a lot, even telling me she'd pissed in a taxi cab whilst drunk. When the scenes were filmed at the woods, I pissed first with Chloe looking on. She was thinking about a piss but decided not to do it and so it was left. 

 

I would have peed if I'd been there. Not sure how much I would have been able to produce, but I certainly wouldn't have wasted the attempt to let out a few drops in nature and feel the fresh air around my lady garden. 

Live maggots under the foreskin makes me feel a bit faint. Yes, I'm very squeamish! Not judging him for having that fetish. If it makes him happy, good for him. ☺

[Hamster245 590]

Of course, the videos I mention can be found here Hamster245 on Xtube