Getting Content Producers to Notice Us

[lugia 228]

We have a "Pee Websites" forum.  We have an "Interviews" forum.  We have at least five other forums discussing what we like, and what we want.  Should we be actively inviting content producers to this community for discussions and direct feedback?

Sometimes I feel like a scavenger crow, searching and gathering what filmmakers and photographers have already produced that coincidentally happens to be what I like. It could be so much easier, I think, with more open lines of communication.  Nearly all the producers on Clips4Sale, for instance, provide emails that we can contact them with, and EroProfile allows for open communication with those who share free content as a hobby.  I wonder: if they knew we existed, would it make a positive impact?

Is there a reason Dixie Comet was the last semi-celebrity we saw here in nearly a year?  Is it the nature of pee video producers to keep to themselves? Do we mainly keep to ourselves because major content providers would get upset at some of the links we've been reposting? I'm just curious about why we haven't thus far bridged the gap.  On a related note, Peeindetail recently went out of business because not enough people were supporting their content. I vouched for them back in January, but imagine if one of their guys had set up a thread in the Interview forum. The folks who'd contributed (at this point) 34,840 views to Will64's "Woman's bare bottoms" thread would've probably been ecstatic to see the unprecedented amount of rear view footage. The entire crowd of the "Fictional Pee Stories" forum would've cheered at the prospect of pee clips with visual storytelling art. Anyone at all who appreciates close-ups would be over the moon at the use of the under-cam.  In short: they would have made themselves known, and we could've made our desires known to them. We lost out on something truly unique and special, and even now, I wonder if they would reboot if they saw that this community supported them.  But we'd have to, y'know, reach out.

And I'm testing the waters to see how we all feel about that.

[spywareonya 37,962]

10 hours ago, lugia said:

Sometimes I feel like a scavenger crow

Lugia, we never talked before, but I have Always sensed "something" in you from some of your textual replies (more often you post videos and other contents) that I have Always appreciated, some kind of depth of thinking

 

just this time, I have to politely disagree with you

To me, the life of a scavenger means freedom, not disrespect

this forum is much friendly also because we are all friends, common people striving to find funny stuff

mostof the time, the people who produces their stuff do NOT want for it to ends up on hosting platforms, usually cut in pieces of 5-10 minutes each, in a pirated way

most of the stuff we all post are links from pornhub or youporn and similar, and many of the links refers to bits of longer movies, uploaded there by hackers

I don't want to be caught in the crossfire, those who produces things OWNS them and could commplain of the use other people (us included) make of those contents, and it's a matter I don't want to be caught into

I like the colloquial stance of this forum, never forget we all talk about outlaw things, the less people involved with rules, laws, and money spot us, the better

 

I see your point, it's not that I don't understand or agree, it's just that after quoting, I counter-reply

[lugia 228]

Fair enough; I've taken your commentary into consideration. Right now, it's all I have to go off, so if nobody else replies, I'll have to assume it's a mutual feeling among the general community. I know other people are reading this.

[spywareonya 37,962]

8 minutes ago, lugia said:

Fair enough; I've taken your commentary into consideration. Right now, it's all I have to go off, so if nobody else replies, I'll have to assume it's a mutual feeling among the general community. I know other people are reading this.

don't be too rushy in assuming that 100 visitors/1 replies means that all visitors agree with me

your thought is not wrong, and I would have endorsed it 100% unless I had the concerns I described, lowering it to 49%

yet it's true that what I wrote is easily agreed upon because it is not made up, yet I am sure people anyway endorse your thought as long as it doesn't clash with their own concerns

[WantonLee 861]

19 hours ago, lugia said:

(...)Should we be actively inviting content producers to this community for discussions and direct feedback?

(...) I wonder: if they knew we existed, would it make a positive impact? (...)

And I'm testing the waters to see how we all feel about that.

Ok, you want feedback, so you should get it.😇

 

The main question is: what kind of content producers/creators do we want to attract? Which in turn begs the questions off "What types of content creators exist?".

My take on that matter takes into account that several years back I was a content crerator, too. I don't want to go into to much details, but it was (very) short stories for a game I once played.

My interest was not only the writing in itself, but of cause also the recognition (why else does anyone do something that is not directly or indirectly related to putting food into ones mouth?)

So, I would not have minded if someone would have helped spreading my stories... AS LONG as they would not claim they had written them.

 

So for all the pee related content creators out there basically only two reasons for creating video's exist:

making money or getting recognized (giving pleasure to someone does in my books fall under recognition in one way or another).

So while people who create videos not for the sake of making money would probably feel at home here,

the people who make money by selling such video's would probably think more about getting new customers - even if their interest in watersport is genuine, as soon as money is involved... it usually shifts the focus away from the pleasure.

They would certainly not start to share their creations for free with us (if they wanted to, they would upload their videos free of charge on sites like eroprofile in the first place)... and I doubt they would look very favorable at people who ripped their creations off.

It might even get this site in trouble if we would invite over money-focused content creators. (They might however get some inspiration for their.. work... from us.)

The content creators that simply want to share their fetish* with likeminded people on the other hand... I think you catch my drift, lugia. 😉

 

* Yes, I will still call it a fetish, if only for the sake of simplyfying the discussion. Sorry spywareonya. 😛 😉

[spywareonya 37,962]

8 minutes ago, WantonLee said:

Sorry spywareonya

for what? I think I didn't understand!!!

Edited May 23, 2018 by spywareonya

[WantonLee 861]

18 hours ago, spywareonya said:

for what? I think I didn't understand!!!

Didn't you explained at some point in some threat 8as a reply to someone else) that from your point of view fetishes did not exist... or did I missread that? o_0

[spywareonya 37,962]

Just now, WantonLee said:

Didn't you explained at some point in some threat 8as a reply to someone else) that from your point of view fetishes did not exist... or did I missread that? o_0

WOW this mean paying attention!!!!

What I meant is that fetish and paraphilia to me are different things, while official science says elsewhere (but thanks to some Freemason friend I had been made privy to the fact that the truth is know, and is just kept hidden to avoid social turmoil)

officially a paraphilia is a psychological twistedness that compels people to get something not specifically sex related in order to achieve arousal

what they are forced by Govs not to tell the world, is the fact that sex in itself works acccording tothe concept of feeling at ease, so unless somebody is unable to get erection unless he bites a socks in the meanwhile, the fact that people get excited with non-sexual stuff is utterly tranquil

let alone fetishes: they are linked to a healthy body and mind (pee, fart, naugthy behaviour etc), nothing more complex than this

we love to see bodily functions on display because they are a trademark of vigorous and healthy women, their fluids being devoid of illness, to the point we can drink them or play with them

it refers to intimacy and hormonal examination of the potential mate by the animal in us, nothing, really nothing more complex than this

weare absolutely normal, the strange ones are those who shun this for some reasons!!!  They are no different, for example, from somebody who… what do I know? ...somebody who feels ashamed to eat while in public… or… what else, about absurd shit? … somebody who's ashamed of the slightest rush of his beard!!! Non-fetishitic people are  brainwashed by Society, and should be helped to return in touch with themselves

to do that, we need real scientifical infos, a bit of spiritual knowledge because is Always useful, and charisma

that's the real reason I am on this forum: to help you all to attain full scientifical knowledge of the fact that you are right being the way you are! That you do not need a "non-judgemental" attitude from the world, because even under actual trial, you would fucking WIN!!!

and then, maybe, convince your various partners… I love you all, and wanna help you all

 

[WantonLee 861]

3 hours ago, spywareonya said:

WOW this mean paying attention!!!!

What I meant is that fetish and paraphilia to me are different things, while official science says elsewhere (but thanks to some Freemason friend I had been made privy to the fact that the truth is know, and is just kept hidden to avoid social turmoil)

officially a paraphilia is a psychological twistedness that compels people to get something not specifically sex related in order to achieve arousal

what they are forced by Govs not to tell the world, is the fact that sex in itself works acccording tothe concept of feeling at ease, so unless somebody is unable to get erection unless he bites a socks in the meanwhile, the fact that people get excited with non-sexual stuff is utterly tranquil

let alone fetishes: they are linked to a healthy body and mind (pee, fart, naugthy behaviour etc), nothing more complex than this

we love to see bodily functions on display because they are a trademark of vigorous and healthy women, their fluids being devoid of illness, to the point we can drink them or play with them

it refers to intimacy and hormonal examination of the potential mate by the animal in us, nothing, really nothing more complex than this

weare absolutely normal, the strange ones are those who shun this for some reasons!!!  They are no different, for example, from somebody who… what do I know? ...somebody who feels ashamed to eat while in public… or… what else, about absurd shit? … somebody who's ashamed of the slightest rush of his beard!!! Non-fetishitic people are  brainwashed by Society, and should be helped to return in touch with themselves

to do that, we need real scientifical infos, a bit of spiritual knowledge because is Always useful, and charisma

that's the real reason I am on this forum: to help you all to attain full scientifical knowledge of the fact that you are right being the way you are! That you do not need a "non-judgemental" attitude from the world, because even under actual trial, you would fucking WIN!!!

and then, maybe, convince your various partners… I love you all, and wanna help you all

 

Ok, it seem's I missed your point then. 😉

I have to agree with you about most of what you wrote, though not everything. Especially the part that says that sientists are forced by the gov to lie to the world - I think it's a bit more complicated, but this would just completely derail this thread and - if you feel inclined to exchange oppinions - should be discussed in a separate thread(*). Plus I am just not in the mood currently to write my thought down. Since English is not my first language, I would need to look up a lot of things in a dictionary, too.

 

Speaking of which, I seemed to not get the part about "somebody is unable to get erection unless he bites a socks in the meanwhile". Is that sock part some sort of a saying, or is it to be taken litteraly as an example for a paraphilia?

I also do not get how this differs from "the fact that people get excited with non-sexual stuff". You write, or better I understand what you wrote as if getting exited with non-sexual stuff is ok, while the sock-thing is not ok. To me, that sock-thing would indeed be a non-sexual thing. I am confuse now. 🤪

 

 

(*) I can imagine you have made you point about this rather clear somewhere else in this forum, but since I am more or less a casual participant and simply have neither the time nor the neccessary patiance to read each and every written word, I have to pick what I read, and so I miss a lot.

[spywareonya 37,962]

1 hour ago, WantonLee said:

or is it to be taken litteraly as an example for a paraphilia?

it wasa funny and by-chance provocational adfirmation

 

1 hour ago, WantonLee said:

I also do not get how this differs from "the fact that people get excited with non-sexual stuff". You write, or better I understand what you wrote as if getting exited with non-sexual stuff is ok, while the sock-thing is not ok. To me, that sock-thing would indeed be a non-sexual thing. I am confuse now.

getting excited is Always good

the UNABILITY of getting excited without a non-sexual extra add shows a block in the unconscious

1 hour ago, WantonLee said:

I can imagine you have made you point about this rather clear somewhere else in this forum, but since I am more or less a casual participant and simply have neither the time nor the neccessary patiance to read each and every written word, I have to pick what I read, and so I miss a lot.

 

1 hour ago, WantonLee said:

Especially the part that says that sientists are forced by the gov to lie to the world - I think it's a bit more complicated,

oh no, my friend, is not more complicated

it is like I said, fair and square

a lot of scientist involved in secret societies know psychological and genetical stuff which could deploy consequences on the sociological stance that is ridicolized as soon as it is written down publicly, some of them I have met in person

 

Love to chat with such a smart fella

[Brutus 2,206]

Look at is this way; Hidden Zone has produced a ton of videos of the voyeur category, my personal favorite. Their content is spread all over the net, illegally chopped and uploaded by countless strangers. Now as much I appreciate being able to see the content without having to buy a subscription, the fact that their content is popular via illegal uploading doesnt help them survive. At the end of the day, they still lose revenue because no one is purchasing. Real Voyeur went under because of this also. So them reaching out to us for example, would make them more well known, but it still wouldn't add much to their revenue, and would result in more illegal spread of their work, at least that's how they would likely see it. They have no reason to assume that we here would offer financial support.

Edited June 1, 2018 by Brutus

[spywareonya 37,962]

On ‎6‎/‎1‎/‎2018 at 7:08 PM, Brutus said:

Look at is this way; Hidden Zone has produced a ton of videos of the voyeur category, my personal favorite. Their content is spread all over the net, illegally chopped and uploaded by countless strangers. Now as much I appreciate being able to see the content without having to buy a subscription, the fact that their content is popular via illegal uploading doesnt help them survive. At the end of the day, they still lose revenue because no one is purchasing. Real Voyeur went under because of this also. So them reaching out to us for example, would make them more well known, but it still wouldn't add much to their revenue, and would result in more illegal spread of their work, at least that's how they would likely see it. They have no reason to assume that we here would offer financial support.

utterly agree