Pee as art

[Ne14sex 299]

I was surfing the web the other day and ran across some pee pictures.

One picture bothered me in particular. It was of a little girl peeing. Way

underage. I said something about it to the uploader and they responded that it was considered

art. What age on something like that is considered art cuz to me it was cp. :mad:

[steve25805 121,343]

I was surfing the web the other day and ran across some pee pictures.

One picture bothered me in particular. It was of a little girl peeing. Way

underage. I said something about it to the uploader and they responded that it was considered

art. What age on something like that is considered art cuz to me it was cp. :mad:

All sorts of stuff gets excused by labelling it as art. But even if something does have artistic merit, that does not detract from the fact that it still is what it is, a kid being filmed peeing. And to me that is crossing a line.

So let's put it this way. If such a pic were ever to be posted here, I would delete it on sight, as I am sure would the other mods or Admin. And the person posting it would be in dire danger of being banned. And I expect that if we didn't see it soon enough, a flood of reports would start pouring in from other members reporting it. Any pics, vids, or drawings of clearly underage people peeing or exposing themselves or performing sexually in any way will be deleted on sight, regardless of any artistic value that might be claimed.

[F.W 5,655]

Absolutely.We dont need that sort of thing.Its not "art" its child porn,i hope never to see that.Over 16 is fine!

[steve25805 121,343]

Over 16 is fine!

Actually, for legal reasons it really needs to be over 18

[Ne14sex 299]

I knew all that. I wouldn't post anything like that. I've been a mod and owned boards in the past. Wasn't asking permission to share, I was wonder what the thoughts where on what people consider art. This pic was going way to far IMO. It just pisses me off the excuses they use. "art", thats all. :frown:

[steve25805 121,343]

I knew all that. I wouldn't post anything like that. I've been a mod and owned boards in the past. Wasn't asking permission to share, I was wonder what the thoughts where on what people consider art. This pic was going way to far IMO. It just pisses me off the excuses they use. "art", thats all. :frown:

No worries. I never took what you said as asking permission to post anything of the kind and it was clear from the very start that you yourself disapproved. I was merely posting my response as general information for everyone.

Sorry if it looked like personal criticism.

But yes, regarding your general point, I do believe that there are some who use "art" as cover for producing some highly questionable material. There has always been a grey area between porn and art with no clear dividing line between the two. Some who delight in shocking people exploit that to push the envelope in entirely unacceptable directions.

[kitty and mimi 118]

On 1/1/2015 at 12:45 PM, steve25805 said:

All sorts of stuff gets excused by labelling it as art. But even if something does have artistic merit, that does not detract from the fact that it still is what it is, a kid being filmed peeing. And to me that is crossing a line.

So let's put it this way. If such a pic were ever to be posted here, I would delete it on sight, as I am sure would the other mods or Admin.

No worries. I never took what you said as asking permission to post anything of the kind and it was clear from the very start that you yourself disapproved. I was merely posting my response as general information for everyone.

 

 

I would not post anything like this either, but there is a old thread on the forum which I already answered that the author do post a picture of a famous statue jeaneke pis (statue of little girl urinating)

the author of the thread asked whether it is fair for everyone to see the famous Manneken Pis Statue(peeing boy statue) while jeaneke pis (a female version) is hidden in side street.

I think whether a picture is porn or art is not just decided by the picture itself, it is decided by the society as a whole, and how they interpret the picture.

for example,the Manneken pis statue is very famous around the world, and no one dare to consider it to be pornography,but the equivalent female statue(jeaneke pis) is not as famous as the male statue. it is hidden in side street and very few people know there is such female statue exist. this is because the double standard of our society, which highly sexualized female public urination,while consider male public urination to be normal or even artistic. in many cultures, male urinals is build in outdoor public environment.people hardly sexualize men who using urinals in public, even though the men who using urinal can sometime seen by women. on the contrary, female urinal in public is uncommon in most of the world. women are supposed to pee inside the stall in ladies room. female urination are usually not seen by other people(not even people of the same sex inside ladies room) this kind of social taboo make female urination even more mysterious and give more sexual meaning to female bodies.Giving sexual meaning to images of female urination is degrading women as sexual objects.