Wondering If Viewer of Videos Gets Frustrated Occasionally.

[Snort McDork 950]

I know operating a video cam is not rocket science, but does require some knowledge of how to "properly" capture a scene of an intended subject. There is one basic concept called "framing" which refers to properly putting your subject within an imaginary dimension that fully covers the subject. In this case: beautiful girls pissing. I've had 3 careers-one of which was working as a News Photographer for several newspapers and even 3 TV stations running a video cam.

So with this in mind, I guess you can say I have a critical P-O-V when it comes to seeing someone doing something I used to do.

What I'm wondering, in the context of seeing videos on here, is there anyone else on here who gets as pissed as I do when you see a video of a hot babe pissing, and the camera operator all of a sudden zooms in, or can't hold the freaking camera still. Does this disturb or un-nerve you? I was just basically wondering if someone else feels rattled when the camera is zoomed out on a sexy babe, and then all of a sudden zooms in on her pussy. 

Perhaps you could consider this a survey of sorts, but would be curious if this unprofessional use of a video camera upsets anyone else, or what you think of someone moves the camera all over the place. 

Your thoughts are welcome.

[Carb0nBased 647]

21 hours ago, Snort McDork said:

I was just basically wondering if someone else feels rattled when the camera is zoomed out on a sexy babe, and then all of a sudden zooms in on her pussy. 

I don't think this is bad photography as much as making an assumption about what the viewer wants to see. Many people like close-ups, therefore video creators try to include close-ups.

Sometimes the zooming/panning in pee or other porn videos can look sloppy, though some of this may be just reflective of how involved the filming of "normal" videos often is. For many scenes in other films, there are multiple cameras capturing different angles (and multiple mics capturing sound from different places in the scene, especially for video of musical performances). I was recently watching this old demo for the first non-linear video editing tool, from 1971: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bNmsKBqFPQ . Of course the video quality was very poor by today's standards, but it's amazing how much editing they were already doing over 50 years ago. Effectively in order to make the video flow, they ironically had to chop up the original footage A LOT. However, capturing all these duplicate "takes" of the same scene requires a lot of equipment and cameras, and in addition to being expensive, I imagine this would put too much pressure on most pee actresses. So they're stuck with one videographer taking video the way someone would film a friend with his or her smartphone, even if using a much better camera.

Personally it doesn't bother me that much--I like videos that feel almost "homemade" and not too staged. Video of a friend peeing by the side of the road can be much more exciting than many porn films, though there are some things that really ruin a video. Super poor resolution or exposure, like security camera footage, isn't interesting to watch, and neither is video where you can't see the stream, even more so when you can't even see a puddle or anything else wet.

 

[Pooler 172]

I prefer the amateur videos over the professional ones whether it be pee, sex, or other fetishes, despite the imperfections of the amateur videos.  Yes, there can be frustrating times where the video is not showing the action, especially in videos where the person sets the camera up and performs in front of it with no one behind the camera. Or in cases where the person recording is also involved in the action and goes off topic without realizing it.  But that is the price we pay for the better and more realistic reactions and emotions. 

[chubbyjack 297]

1 hour ago, Pooler said:

I prefer the amateur videos over the professional ones whether it be pee, sex, or other fetishes, despite the imperfections of the amateur videos.  Yes, there can be frustrating times where the video is not showing the action, especially in videos where the person sets the camera up and performs in front of it with no one behind the camera. Or in cases where the person recording is also involved in the action and goes off topic without realizing it.  But that is the price we pay for the better and more realistic reactions and emotions. 

Amateur for sure 

 

I hate fake amateur

  A clip with is supposedly a hidden cam yet there are multiple camera angles.

[Takashi96 1,078]

On 11/22/2024 at 4:32 AM, Snort McDork said:

I know operating a video cam is not rocket science, but does require some knowledge of how to "properly" capture a scene of an intended subject. There is one basic concept called "framing" which refers to properly putting your subject within an imaginary dimension that fully covers the subject. In this case: beautiful girls pissing. I've had 3 careers-one of which was working as a News Photographer for several newspapers and even 3 TV stations running a video cam.

So with this in mind, I guess you can say I have a critical P-O-V when it comes to seeing someone doing something I used to do.

What I'm wondering, in the context of seeing videos on here, is there anyone else on here who gets as pissed as I do when you see a video of a hot babe pissing, and the camera operator all of a sudden zooms in, or can't hold the freaking camera still. Does this disturb or un-nerve you? I was just basically wondering if someone else feels rattled when the camera is zoomed out on a sexy babe, and then all of a sudden zooms in on her pussy. 

Perhaps you could consider this a survey of sorts, but would be curious if this unprofessional use of a video camera upsets anyone else, or what you think of someone moves the camera all over the place. 

Your thoughts are welcome.

I am not a camera person by trade, nor do I have any formal training in the art of videography. That being said, yes, shitty camera work drives me insane!! Nothing ruins a perfectly good hard-on like anger. Shakey camera work, speed zooms, etc. However, my greatest pet peeve by far is when a person is pissing in someone's mouth the camera operator zooms in on the mouth so that the pissing genitals are completely out of frame. Seeing the face of the pisser is nice too. But I need to at least see the vulva/penis doing the delivering.

I don't really have the same standards for cell phone videos. Those are usually spontaneous so I get it. Unless they're whipping the phone all over the place. Sure, I understand they've been drinking all night, but c'mon. I've seen pee vids that have less stability than a fly wearing a microscopic go-pro at a picnic.