watchr12

19 minutes ago, durianfury said:

Link to the pissing threads? I took a cursory glance and didnt see any category for pissing.

Search works quite well. I don't think there are any categories for peeing, but there are many threads in various categories. Some I've had good luck include:

https://www.forumophilia.com/topic397574.html

https://www.forumophilia.com/topic199498.html

https://www.forumophilia.com/topic719477.html

https://www.forumophilia.com/topic453956.html

https://www.forumophilia.com/topic419493.html

https://www.forumophilia.com/topic724750.html

https://www.forumophilia.com/topic228082.html

The search engine is better than many, since it includes exact phrases, rather than just single keywords that is largely useless. Also, be sure to set Previous Posts to All Posts to get the most hits. Good luck!

Good idea, thanks for doing this!

This was posted to r/pee last week, looks like a lot to check out. Happy hunting!

https://www.reddit.com/r/wowthissubexists/comments/hookvq/rwowthissubexists_official_fap_friday_thread_july/fxjl5t0/

Despite being around since '06, this site is new to me. Several very long forums with lots of peeing vids (I've posted some of the beach ones I've found in the Videos section). You may want to pay for FBoom (20GB/day), or it'll take a lifetime to d/l all the goodies. Enjoy!

https://www.forumophilia.com/

11 hours ago, Scot_Lover said:

Nice, it's another File Boom site.

Have you paid for access? The restrictions on the unpaid d/l are crazy, 120 min wait time, 105 min d/l for a 300 meg file (capped at 30kps), it's just wasteful.

If you have signed up, could you let us know if it's workable?

Thanks

Depending on how much time you have, you may want to consider one of the FileBoom shorter memberships. Premium Pro is $10US for 3 days, 50GB/day, and (IIRC) $6 for same length, 30GB/day. I paid for the $6 one last month, and was able to d/l six files at once, at a pretty good speed (~2Mbps). Good luck!

For me, Literotica is notable because its search engine is unusual: if  you search for "pee" (no quotes), you actually get just that in the results. It doesn't return "speeding" or "speech" or anything else with "pee" in it (unless those words are also in a story). Virtually all other search engines aren't as discriminating, so the quality of searches is much higher. Highly recommended.

Girls peeing

15 hours ago, Pissguy said:

Check out HDhole.com

Foundit recently and there's some good stuff on there

Thanks for sharing! Some new to me, lots of XHamster with pee content.

On 11/27/2019 at 4:39 PM, vpw said:

Brass was undisputed king of erotica at its very best be it the beautiful true seductress he made out of his female characters with their expression and truly authentic femininity or the way he portrayed the basic sexuality in humans. 

Hear! Hear!

You may want to search for director Tinto Brass, who has included peeing scenes in some of his films. One is "The Key":

https://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=ph599c5bbb5a137  It's only 480 lines resolution, but is not bad nonetheless. Enjoy!

Hi, VPW.

I've read your experiences in many places over the years, especially Xossip (which seems to have disappeared). Are you posting anywhere else beside PeeFans these days?

Thanks again!

Thanks! However, it looks (on first glance) that they're largely pay sites. Also, it doesn't seem really current: for example, PeeGoneWild at Reddit has slowed considerably in the last six months, and has been replaced by https://www.reddit.com/r/Pee/ as the busy site. PeeFans is still the champ!

Page and image loading seems to be considerably faster than before: thanks!

I have to say that I find that the delayed image downloading is greatly slowing page loading on long pages. This is very noticeable when having to go to the bottom of a given page to see the latest posts. Is there any chance there may be a way to allow users to set pages to load with the newest posts first, so that the user will not have to wait for the rest of the page to load, and PF won't have to waste bandwidth? Thanks!

Here's the direct source for every FF version from 0.1 (Oct 2015) on: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/

I've kept it up-to-date because of security issues, and to keep NoScript working. I do like Brave as well, but it's pretty strictly aimed at being ad-free. There's also DuckDuckGo browser, which goes for privacy, but not sure how well it keeps unwanted scripts off your machine.

Thanks for the info.

On 4/5/2019 at 5:17 AM, Admin said:

The first thing you mentioned is actually by design - lazy loading. It was being trialled as the logic is that images only load when viewable on the page, meaning when you first go to a picture page rather than trying to load 50 pictures at 2MB each all at once, it should just load the ones you can see. 

I've seen similar setups on other pages. As pages get longer, there are more images to load when getting down the page to new posts. Is it possible to have thumbnails or smaller images? That would mean less bandwidth on your servers, but I'm not familiar with how this is structured. I do appreciate the placeholders, since it's no longer a race to keep up with the lengthening page as images load.

If you have a very fast internet connection, this wouldn't help you (and may create the effect you described), but for people with slower connections it should work better, and reduce overall bandwidth usage. At this moment, using fast.com (by Netflix), it shows: 70Mbps, Latency Unloaded 14 ms, Loaded 140 ms, Upload 6.5 Mbps. I've seen speeds up to 95Mbps, but not this morning. Plenty fast, though.

Not entirely sure about your second point as not experiencing that myself. Could you please provide a screenshot or more detail on what you mean and I'll get that fixed? 🙂  

Here you go:

Thanks again!

Not to complain, but the site seems slower to me. I'm using Firefox 66.0.2 (64 bit). I notice two things: images load only as I scroll down, rather than loading when the page is opened, whether or not I scroll; and, when the page loads, undisplayed images are have full-sized placeholders, so the page immediately can become very long, rather than formatting as the images are loaded.

One other thing that seems new is the popup label for the insertion point in the comment box. If I don't move the pointer away from the text, the popup obscures what's being typed. Hope this makes sense.

Thanks for all your work making this a home for us.

Google limits each translation to 5000 characters, so it can take a while to translate anything longer than a fairly short story.

Thanks for the info!

Can anyone suggest a good site for text translation? Google Translate has limited how much text it will translate at one time (used to be 5k characters, now much less). Also, I'd prefer not to have Google looking over my shoulder. I'm not looking for something that will translate a web page on the fly, but where text can be dropped into a field and translated into English.

Thanks!

hmmmmm 😜

Rather than ask what we think, what do the numbers tell you? Are very many active (not total) members using chat and/or clubs? I have to say that I've never used the former and rarely the latter. I come here pretty much daily to use the forums, and that's it, FWIW. Thanks for asking, and I'm looking forward to what happens.

21 hours ago, UnabashedUser said:

Entire thread here well worth re-reading again. Victorians certainly enjoyed watersports and raw jackhammer fucking.

Quite so! I suggest checking lustybooks.com for words like piddle. Not a lot of hits, but interesting nonetheless. Here's one that has several hits on that word: http://lustybooks.com/erotica/12/queenie-lady-harper/p-1.html

Here's another one: http://lustybooks.com/erotica/4/the-naive-young-niece-or-the-romance-of-mesmerism-mark-taylor/p-3.html I think there are more instances in the second title, but leave the searching to you. Enjoy!

6 hours ago, likesToLick said:

Site works OK for me with firefox 59.0.2 in windows 10.

I did have some problems with Firefox when using it with an older version of Windows.

Hmmmmm: I'm running Win 7 SP1, don't see a build number. Woe is I.