pbl

Is there anyone who enjoys contemporary classical music? I'm quite a fan of Philip Glass, John Adams and Steve Reich.

On 11/11/2017 at 3:00 AM, fannywatcher said:

I was just watching some Japanese girl having a piss(on video only),and she seemed to be aware of the camera,after a few seconds i could actually see her clitoris enlarge,as she must have become aroused at being filmed.Like she was achieving female erection or something?Lovely.She did seem to wipe for slightly longer than usual,naughty girl,whoever she is.

Which video were you watching?

I just want to thank all the women who shared their experiences. As a man, it is sometimes a challenge to understand the diversity of outcomes different women attain. Typically, I might encounter one porn video of a woman peeing while standing like an expert, but I have no clue whether or not this is typical for her or if she just won the lottery. It is a shame there aren't more producers who focus on this kind of content, which would allow the viewer to learn from the repeated trials and greater sample size.

Glad to see new people join the forum. How long have you known you had a pee fetish? Since childhood? Or is it something you developed later on?

I subscribed to WDgirls once for a month, but I tend to stick to purchasing custom videos because my specific interest (girls trying to pee standing up like men) isn't covered very often in premade content. In the past few years, I've probably spent $1000 on amateur videos.

On 7/10/2017 at 9:05 AM, lauren.mutton said:

Have you ever used a urinal before?  Can you pee into one standing up using the v-finger method, which involves spreading the labia so they do not block the stream, and pulling up so that the pee goes forwards? 

Dixie, were you one of those girls who tried to pee standing up over and over when you were young despite the fact it was messy? Apart from the v-finger method, are there any other strategies that you have tried (successful or not)?

You'd probably be better received advertising in the Marketplace forum: http://peefans.com/index.php?/forum/37-marketplace/

Is it just panties, or do you produce videos too?

On 2/18/2017 at 5:30 PM, Sophie said:

Do you have a link you could share please?

I'd like to second this request.

Yes! Watching the sequence from when the urine leaks out the back of the vulva until the stream gains enough force to pry the labia apart is my favorite! It's best seen when a woman is standing straight up because she can go from dripping down her legs to projecting a coherent stream out in front.

I think there is a suitable sub-forum elsewhere for discussing politics. Please move such discussions there and keep this thread focused on the humorous observation that DJT allgedly enjoys golden showers.

Some big allegations regarding American President-Elect Donald Trump: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3259984-Trump-Intelligence-Allegations.html#document/p2 

Quote

 

According to Source D, where s/he had been present, TRUMP's (perverted) conduct in
Moscow included hiring the presidential suite of the Ritz Carlton Hotel,
where he knew President and Mrs. OBAMA {whom he hated] had stayed
on one of their official trips to Russia, and defiling the bed where they had
slept by employing a number of prostitutes to perform a 'golden showers'
(urination) show in front of him. The hotel was known to be under FSE
control with microphones and concealed cameras in all the main rooms
to record anything they wanted to.

 

Looks like I won't be booking a room at the Moscow Ritz Carlton the next time I need a discreet place to have some fun.

I think having a woman moderating this forum is an excellent decision. I wish Sophie well.

Thank you for providing this information. I hope the updated software was worth the extra 2 weeks' wait. I look forward to resuming the community here.

Yes, but then the women always end up sitting or squatting during the actual urination. Maybe I'm in the minority, but this always ruins things for me.

Wouldn't a standing posture make the woman seem more dominant? For me, the illusion always breaks when I see the woman sit down or squat, which I associate with submission.

I saw that one one coming a mile off and have been waiting for it. It was so transparently obvious that linking the two was going to be your aim from the start

Great! I am glad to see that I am communicating effectively.

Egwalrus was insisting upon his right to engage in open flame wars with fellow mods, which does enormous reputational damage to any forum, and which Admin explicitly stated was not acceptable behaviour for mods. In fact, he made Egwalrus's continuation as a mod conditional upon his ceasing such behaviour, his refusal of such ultimately leading to his modship being removed. But we have no rules against ordinary members criticising us, though clearly if this extends to the point of becoming a highly destructive personal vendetta with no end in sight that damages the forum, Admin will eventually call a halt to it, as has been demonstrated. But, probably on the assumption that it would burn itself out of it's own accord, Admin was initially prepared to let Egwalrus make his criticisms as an ordinary member. Personally, I think that just muddied the waters.

This is where you are wrong. Before he lost his modship, Egwalrus never engaged in an open flame war. He pointed out you were wrong to call Goldenpiss as cheap and for that you and Admin have scapegoated him for all the damage you did to this forum.

I, however, in this instance was acting wholly within my role as a mod in safeguarding the forum from potentially highly questionable content, and in no way engaging in flame wars with my colleagues. I was doing my duty as as a mod in protecting this place from the risk of being potentially taken down or suffering legal or legislative hassles.

There is a massive difference between consent and non-consent when it comes to erotica, especially if the latter were ever to involve harm or injury being cruelly inflicted upon unwilling victims. The authorities everywhere are far more likely to go after something non-consensual. I'm sure you must understand that.

Most of the membership can certainly see that except for a small number of malcontents on a mission.

On the legal merits of the fantasy in question, I have no problem with moderators such as you working asking authors such as Brutus to be mindful of the potential legal implications of such stories involving non-consensual relationships. However, that is no license to publicly insult another members' fantasies. When you are a mod, you represent the Admin and the whole forum, which means you don't accuse another member of psychopathy. There is a proper and professional way of handling this, such as sending a polite private message to the member in question.

I do not intend sneaking under the radar by posting under an anonymous name, especially with something so relatively innocuous. And I was trying to ward off in as informal a way as possible any move across red lines. Pedantic objections to that made something more formal necessary instead.

And it is not a case of fantasies I do or do not approve of. I see many that don't really do it for me but I just ignore them. It is a case of using moderator judgement to ensure that fantasies do not cross any red lines into the kind of areas that could result in legal difficulties for Admin, or for the site being taken down. The stories had not crossed such lines, but their content was such that there was always the danger that they could do. After all, there is a world of difference between consent and non consent, and the fantasies themselvses involved massive non-consent from terrified individuals being treated with cruelty.

Surely you can see the potential danger here? It is not a question of my own personal tastes at all, but of what could be considered risky for the forum itself.

Well put. Too bad the you and the admin are too blind to extend the same logic to Egwalrus.

Perhaps Steve should create a second, nonmoderator account if he wants to inartfully comment on fantasies he doesn't approve of? That way, nobody confuses these ideas for those of an official moderator.

Lojoboy,

Welcome to peefans. Between the mimicry of male urination technique as well as the desire to hold a male member whilst he urinates, it sounds like to me that you might be a wee bit envious of us men.

Don't play me for a fool. I saw what you did and what you didn't do. You are conflating things Egwalrus has said more recently with things he said before he was stricken from the mod club.

So I am asking you, how do we put an end to this and move on?

Permit mods to publicly criticize one another when defending another member from public attacks. Drop the stupid "unified front" canard.

That's why I love watching it so much! She tries so hard to avoid making a mess, yet ends up wetting the jeans anyway. Truly, this is the only way for a staged video to feature a genuine accident.

I think one element that frustrates me the most is that most sites get divided into either "peeing" or "wetting". It makes things challenging for someone like me who enjoys a hybrid. Already, many wetting sites depict women peeing while standing, albeit while fully clothed. I have sent requests to the site operators that the model attempt to keep the jeans dry by peeing through the fly and the response is almost always, "This is a wetting site; we do not film nude peeing". Alternatively, if I message a peeing site to request that they shoot a model trying to pee through the fly in her jeans, I get the message, "This is a peeing site; we do not film wetting".

I might be in the minority, but I am often frustrated by the lack of scenes depicting women trying to pee standing like men. This is in spite of the fact that countless women attempted to do this when they were young and curious. For a fetish that is often about naughty transgressions of normal behavior, it baffles me how 95+% of nude pee scenes feature a woman who either squats or sits. I presume the producers are choosing to do this because they think the viewer wants to see the vulva in as explicit manner as possible. However, that misses the whole point of pee fetishes, which for many people is about naughty rule-breaking and not about wanton lasciviousness.

I noticed that the previews seem to feature the same girls who appear on other adult websites (notably Annie & Dee), so they have clearly moved away from the "amateur" set-up that first achieved them so much success.