yahweh 2 Posted August 2 Share Posted August 2 Thats against our rights like im sorry but scat isnt bad.im not mad at you guys this place is great im just disappointed that censorship won.i like scat and its harmless when u gollow certainly n safety guides.alot like bondage. Link to post
gldenwetgoose 21,535 Posted August 2 Share Posted August 2 5 hours ago, yahweh said: Thats against our rights like im sorry but scat isnt bad.im not mad at you guys this place is great im just disappointed that censorship won.i like scat and its harmless when u gollow certainly n safety guides.alot like bondage. Nobody's stopping you being into it - we're just telling you this isn't the place for it. It's explained in the site rules and also here. It's very similar to the example that when you walk into a clothes store they sell clothes. If instead you want to buy shoes you need to visit a shoe store. The clue is in the name, and our site is called Peefans. 1 2 Link to post
Foobar 792 Posted October 25 Share Posted October 25 Can we have at least some type of trivial spam protection? I'm not even that active but so many times I see some bot is spamming the same sketchy link on every single thread. 2 Link to post
oliver2 4,490 Posted October 25 Share Posted October 25 I dare say there is some level of spam protection, but the pesky spammers keep finding ways around it 2 Link to post
gldenwetgoose 21,535 Posted October 25 Share Posted October 25 57 minutes ago, Foobar said: Can we have at least some type of trivial spam protection? I'm not even that active but so many times I see some bot is spamming the same sketchy link on every single thread. 21 minutes ago, oliver2 said: I dare say there is some level of spam protection, but the pesky spammers keep finding ways around it I know @Admin has done what's possible. For example, in response to the xstrip-ers it's now a thing that new members need to enter something in the Favourite Thing and Hottest Experience fields. Along with having a valid email address etc. The current spammers are a nuisance, they meet the entry criteria and then they rapidly hit all over the site - maybe 50 spam posts in an hour. But the good news is that one staff click of the spam button on their profile and their every post vanishes. Quick and easy. I guess there are other measures that could be put in place if the problem got worse - maybe anybody can register to view the site using the current mechanism, but a member of staff would need to validate their profile to allow two way site interaction ? But given the nature of our kink, I can imagine that could deter a lot of genuine users from wanting to go through that rigmarole. 2 Link to post
Foobar 792 Posted October 25 Share Posted October 25 18 minutes ago, gldenwetgoose said: I know @Admin has done what's possible. For example, in response to the xstrip-ers it's now a thing that new members need to enter something in the Favourite Thing and Hottest Experience fields. Along with having a valid email address etc. The current spammers are a nuisance, they meet the entry criteria and then they rapidly hit all over the site - maybe 50 spam posts in an hour. But the good news is that one staff click of the spam button on their profile and their every post vanishes. Quick and easy. I guess there are other measures that could be put in place if the problem got worse - maybe anybody can register to view the site using the current mechanism, but a member of staff would need to validate their profile to allow two way site interaction ? But given the nature of our kink, I can imagine that could deter a lot of genuine users from wanting to go through that rigmarole. I was thinking along the lines of ratelimiting the number of times per hour a specific user can post links, particularly new users (or less than a certain rep) Of course, I don't know anything about what you have to work with so it's just guesswork. Link to post
gldenwetgoose 21,535 Posted October 25 Share Posted October 25 15 minutes ago, Foobar said: I was thinking along the lines of ratelimiting the number of times per hour a specific user can post links, particularly new users (or less than a certain rep) That's a good point @Admin - and could potentially deter, or at least slow, the occasional new members who make five trivial posts so they can start banging out the DMs - if they're limited to lest that five posts before a timeout kicks in. Maybe. Link to post
MC Cumzy 1,662 Posted October 25 Share Posted October 25 18 minutes ago, annefarrell said: https://map-find.co/423884435 Speak of the devil... Link to post
on the porch 731 Posted October 25 Share Posted October 25 2 hours ago, gldenwetgoose said: I know @Admin has done what's possible. For example, in response to the xstrip-ers it's now a thing that new members need to enter something in the Favourite Thing and Hottest Experience fields. Along with having a valid email address etc. The current spammers are a nuisance, they meet the entry criteria and then they rapidly hit all over the site - maybe 50 spam posts in an hour. But the good news is that one staff click of the spam button on their profile and their every post vanishes. Quick and easy. I guess there are other measures that could be put in place if the problem got worse - maybe anybody can register to view the site using the current mechanism, but a member of staff would need to validate their profile to allow two way site interaction ? But given the nature of our kink, I can imagine that could deter a lot of genuine users from wanting to go through that rigmarole. You have a spammer now flooding the site with a dating site Link to post
MC Cumzy 1,662 Posted October 25 Share Posted October 25 While on the topic of spammers, Is there a way to report a user rather than just certain posts? Link to post
gldenwetgoose 21,535 Posted October 26 Share Posted October 26 16 hours ago, MC Cumzy said: While on the topic of spammers, Is there a way to report a user rather than just certain posts? Thanks @MC Cumzy Just quote a post or message from them and explain in the field what it is you feel needs reporting about that member. Note that in the case of ‘I think this may be a man pretending to be a young lady’ or ‘this person seems very young’ then there isn’t always much we can do. But we definitely treat every report seriously. 1 Link to post
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now