Jump to content

Is the Loch Ness monster real?


Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, spywareonya said:

As said, maybe Nessie doesn't live there, and comes only for spawning, and happily lives in the ocean

It would have to be a creature equally at home in both seawater and fresh water.

But fish of this kind exist so why not Nessie?

Am not convinced though. Would not eggs have been found by now?

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
Link to post
On ‎4‎/‎19‎/‎2019 at 7:43 PM, steve25805 said:

It would have to be a creature equally at home in both seawater and fresh water.

But fish of this kind exist so why not Nessie?

Am not convinced though. Would not eggs have been found by now?

 

On ‎4‎/‎19‎/‎2019 at 7:52 PM, speedy3471 said:

You make a good point here. It's hard to belive that eggs haven't been found but I still like to believe in the existence of Nessie haha

A little in&out before celebrating the occult side of Easter

 

If Nessie is an elasmosaurus, they spawned live younglings, they did not lay eggs

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Love 1
Link to post

I think weird things exists yes but i don't think that a lake monster could hide i mean 2019 everyone has a camera and the smallest thing ends up on insta snap or facebook etc and if it did exist it's problaby dead a looooong time ago im not saying im right tho btw would you dare to swim in that lake for 10min?😂

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Love 1
Link to post
11 hours ago, Peefreak99 said:

I think weird things exists yes but i don't think that a lake monster could hide i mean 2019 everyone has a camera and the smallest thing ends up on insta snap or facebook etc and if it did exist it's problaby dead a looooong time ago im not saying im right tho btw would you dare to swim in that lake for 10min?😂

Indeed nobody believes it could live in the Loch

No carcass had ever been found, and the food is not enough

 

Even Nessie-Believers (I have online contacts with them) are absolutely sure that either

#1 there are deep-crust tunnels leading to the ocean (as water in the depths has peculiar characteristics, not that different from that kind of mixed waters where rivers ends up in the sea) and Nessie lives in the ocean and get into the Loch just to reproduce or relax

#2 Nessie is just a big fish that was seen as even bigger by water distortion giving the impression of a monster, and nothing really lives there and it's all a hoax/misunderstanding

 

So yes nobody (not even Nessie-Believers) thinks the monster, if it exist, could live there

We just believe it lives in the Ocean and gets there just occasionally

 

Never forget that quite close to the Northest fringes of Scotland there is Denmark, and original Norse legends about Drakkar (Dragons) started there, not in Norway or Sweden (they were most interested in trolls and anthropomorphic fairies), and were described as having finns, small bodies and log necks, EXACTLY like Elasmosaurus, which is what 99% believers consider Nessie to be

  • Love 2
Link to post
1 hour ago, spywareonya said:

Indeed nobody believes it could live in the Loch

No carcass had ever been found, and the food is not enough

 

Even Nessie-Believers (I have online contacts with them) are absolutely sure that either

#1 there are deep-crust tunnels leading to the ocean (as water in the depths has peculiar characteristics, not that different from that kind of mixed waters where rivers ends up in the sea) and Nessie lives in the ocean and get into the Loch just to reproduce or relax

#2 Nessie is just a big fish that was seen as even bigger by water distortion giving the impression of a monster, and nothing really lives there and it's all a hoax/misunderstanding

 

So yes nobody (not even Nessie-Believers) thinks the monster, if it exist, could live there

We just believe it lives in the Ocean and gets there just occasionally

 

Never forget that quite close to the Northest fringes of Scotland there is Denmark, and original Norse legends about Drakkar (Dragons) started there, not in Norway or Sweden (they were most interested in trolls and anthropomorphic fairies), and were described as having finns, small bodies and log necks, EXACTLY like Elasmosaurus, which is what 99% believers consider Nessie to be

Why can't we just send a submarine to  check it out i mean if there was tunnels the sub would find them and i think  your second answer is most likely mabye a drunk fisherman saw a huuuuge fish and then told his friends he saw a monster fish and then they told the story to their friends etc and for each time the story was told nessie got bigger and more dangerous just like most stories 

  • Haha 2
  • Agree 1
Link to post
4 hours ago, Peefreak99 said:

Why can't we just send a submarine to  check it out i mean if there was tunnels the sub would find them

The Loch is bigger than you may imagine, and nobody would spend the money it costs to check if there are tunnels or not

Nobody rich is interested in getting such a definitive answer!!!

 

4 hours ago, Peefreak99 said:

and i think  your second answer is most likely mabye a drunk fisherman saw a huuuuge fish and then told his friends he saw a monster fish and then they told the story to their friends etc and for each time the story was told nessie got bigger and more dangerous just like most stories 

Very likely. I accept there is the chance for Nessie not to be real, but I have my personal reasons to believe it is

 

 

  • Love 1
Link to post

In the 70s,famous naturalist Sir Peter Scott launched a submarine expedition to search underwater in Loch Ness.One uncertain picture did come out of it,something resembling a fin,possibly.It wasnt Peter Scott,it was a guy called Robert Rines,Peter Scott thought of the latin name actually.

He named it Nessiteras rhombopteryx.He seemed to think there was "something" unknown,be it a large fish,or whale,some creature endemic to the area,that occurs nowhere else.He was a zoologist,not given to flights of fancy.So maybe...

Edited by F.W
  • Like 1
  • Love 1
Link to post
15 minutes ago, Paulypeeps said:

Was that Latin name not found to be an anagram of:-

"Monster hoax by Sir Peter S"

 

34 minutes ago, F.W said:

In the 70s,famous naturalist Sir Peter Scott launched a submarine expedition to search underwater in Loch Ness.One uncertain picture did come out of it,something resembling a fin,possibly.It wasnt Peter Scott,it was a guy called Robert Rines,Peter Scott thought of the latin name actually.

He named it Nessiteras rhombopteryx.He seemed to think there was "something" unknown,be it a large fish,or whale,some creature endemic to the area,that occurs nowhere else.He was a zoologist,not given to flights of fancy.So maybe...

Sometimes scientists are afraid to admit they believe in something so they pretend to be cynical on the subject

As a Witch, I can tell you that important scientists that publicly claim absolute materialism, secretely perform experiments on psychich powers and even seances

 

So I can absolutely believe this scientist hid a cynical joke in the name it crafted, but just to mislead accusers, not necessarily because he was an unbeliever himself

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
Link to post

One way would be to do like when they go shark fishing,and get a few boats and start chumming,throwing overboard offal,and fish guts etc,to make a big stinky mess in the water,maybe would attract something.

Trouble with nessie,is there is more evidence against it,than for it.All the footage has been studied and proven to be NOT a "monster".A more extreme way would be to dam the Loch and see what happens,when the water is released.

  • Agree 1
Link to post
33 minutes ago, F.W said:

One way would be to do like when they go shark fishing,and get a few boats and start chumming,throwing overboard offal,and fish guts etc,to make a big stinky mess in the water,maybe would attract something

 

Sharks are the only known fish that doesn't fear the sound of engines… if I was Nessie, I would never get near a boat

I even wrote it in my fictional story!!! Ihihihihihi!!!

 

33 minutes ago, F.W said:

Trouble with nessie,is there is more evidence against it,than for it.All the footage has been studied and proven to be NOT a "monster".A more extreme way would be to dam the Loch and see what happens,when the water is released.

This was ACTUALLY proposed in the past!!!

But it will be an action of monumental size, impossible to be actually performed

I absolutely know all evidences are against it, I just focus on those that could at least make it possible

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
Link to post
17 hours ago, spywareonya said:

The Loch is bigger than you may imagine, and nobody would spend the money it costs to check if there are tunnels or not

Nobody rich is interested in getting such a definitive answer!!!

 

Very likely. I accept there is the chance for Nessie not to be real, but I have my personal reasons to believe it is

 

 

Why don't we steal a sub and a plane so we can transport it and then we would problaby need a truck so we can bring it to the lake and someone that knows how to drive it whos with me😂😂😂 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
17 hours ago, spywareonya said:

The Loch is bigger than you may imagine, and nobody would spend the money it costs to check if there are tunnels or not

Nobody rich is interested in getting such a definitive answer!!!

 

Very likely. I accept there is the chance for Nessie not to be real, but I have my personal reasons to believe it is

 

 

Well we could steal a sub and a plane so we can transport it and also a truck or a shopper so we can take it to the lake not complicated at all😂 whos with me? Xd 

  • Haha 2
Link to post
6 hours ago, spywareonya said:

If it's to find Nessie even more!!!

You could always try searching inside whatever pair of underpants I am wearing at the time.

Your chances of finding Nessie there would be zero of course. But I'd sure enjoy your search. Lol

  • Haha 2
Link to post
3 hours ago, steve25805 said:

You could always try searching inside whatever pair of underpants I am wearing at the time.

Your chances of finding Nessie there would be zero of course. But I'd sure enjoy your search. Lol

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

wELL, MAYBE there is a monster down there...

  • Haha 2
  • Love 1
Link to post
11 minutes ago, Super Mario said:

I was there last Monday and did not see any monsters, the only one around was mine haha

Ok first of all thank you for being here

Posting in a General Chat as one of your first actions in a porn forum says marvels on the width of your character, so really, thank you

 

For the fact you did not see it, beside the jokes in last posts, we explored many possibilities along the thread, obviously knowing they're just suppositions, but even believers do not expect to see it surface 24/7!!!

Kisses!!!

  • Like 2
  • Love 1
Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...