Art of Pee

[spywareonya 37,962]

On ‎8‎/‎31‎/‎2018 at 6:16 AM, DXR said:

Another one from GT

 

 

Ok this is glorious thank you!!!

[expererg 1,185]

https://www.xvideos.com/video6395793/13/nessa_devil_-_dark_temptaion

[DXR 834]

On 9/2/2018 at 4:01 PM, spywareonya said:

Ok this is glorious thank you!!!

Found one more for ya

[steve25805 126,116]

[steve25805 126,116]

[steve25805 126,116]

[steve25805 126,116]

[steve25805 126,116]

[steve25805 126,116]

[steve25805 126,116]

[spywareonya 37,962]

3 hours ago, steve25805 said:

HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEY

The Grindhoud Club!!!!

Great Steve

[Sexismygod 1,782]

This is an interesting topic.  We've all seen the comments or complaints about poorly made piss porn, be it photo or video, but how often do we recognise the skill of the photographer, videographer or editor.

I think there is a lot of pee-related material out there that many of us would consider artistic.  And there's a lot that shows real talent that much of the world would consider "just porn" because of the subject matter.  Personally, I think there's a lot of rubbish out there that the world considers "art".  In the end, it's the viewer that decides.

Many of the pictures here show a level of expertise that would be automatically defined as art if it didn't show urine and genitalia.  I'm often confused by the refusal of society to recognise talent just because it depicts something the majority deems inappropriate.  I'm guilty, too.  There are subjects I don't choose to look at, but that doesn't mean it's not well crafted or intelligently made.  

Talent is talent ... you may not like the choice of subject but that doesn't mean it's not art.

[spywareonya 37,962]

Edited July 9, 2019 by spywareonya

[spywareonya 37,962]

58 minutes ago, Sexismygod said:

This is an interesting topic.  We've all seen the comments or complaints about poorly made piss porn, be it photo or video, but how often do we recognise the skill of the photographer, videographer or editor.

I think there is a lot of pee-related material out there that many of us would consider artistic.  And there's a lot that shows real talent that much of the world would consider "just porn" because of the subject matter.  Personally, I think there's a lot of rubbish out there that the world considers "art".  In the end, it's the viewer that decides.

Many of the pictures here show a level of expertise that would be automatically defined as art if it didn't show urine and genitalia.  I'm often confused by the refusal of society to recognise talent just because it depicts something the majority deems inappropriate.  I'm guilty, too.  There are subjects I don't choose to look at, but that doesn't mean it's not well crafted or intelligently made.  

Talent is talent ... you may not like the choice of subject but that doesn't mean it's not art.

I usually pick the quote portions but this post deserved to be quoted in its entirety

I cannot say anything else than thank you: it is such an Amazing comment

And I absolutely agree with EVERY SINGLE WORD YOU WROTE

Greetings!!!

[Dr.P 1,473]

"Toilet Girl"

This is one of my favorite examples of erotic art, featuring a woman peeing. Her wanton facial expression, very open peeing style, separating her lips with her fingers, clothing, and its arrangement, all indicate that she is enjoying herself, and showing off her sexuality, which is intimately connected with her peeing. Although it is a black and white hand drawing, it shows plenty of erotic detail, including her stream splitting into two streams, above the seat, and some pee dribbles on her left thigh, above her stocking top. So the artist is quite skilled, and the picture is very real, to the viewer.

Trying to guess the source of this picture, and its historical age, is a bit of a challenge. I tried Googling "arkham" and "www.armyofdarkness.com" from the bottom of the picture, but didn't find anything that seemed relevant. The style of her garters, stockings, shoes, and panties all suggest mid to late twentieth century, to me, as does her dress and jacket. Her elaborate hair and makeup suggest that she may be French. But the toilet style, open plumbing, and very simple tissue roller suggest the first half of the twentieth century, rather than the second. So the origin is mysterious.

I found this picture in two places on the web:

http://www.eroprofile.com/m/photos/view/toiletgirl

The same picture, at about 30% higher resolution appears in the imagefap link below. (You can actually see some of her piss dribbles on her thighs and the seat, as well as the splitting of her stream into two, above the seat. Apparently, the artist was very detail-oriented, as I am!) 🙂

http://www.imagefap.com/photo/2039869479/?pgid=&gid=3865882&page=0#28

[gldenwetgoose 21,495]

Ok - so I'll grant you there isn't actually any peeing immediately going on in this picture...  but all the signs are there, right?

Who's going to produce the biggest puddle?

[oliver2 4,419]

On 8/29/2018 at 6:07 AM, DXR said:

 

 

Oh she’s LOVELY, the way she’s looking at the camera like she’s deliberately sharing the experience of peeing in the waves with us. The sensibility, the vibe behind it is a lot like @Audrey81‘s posts (but A. would have shown us a thicker, stronger pee stream!)

[Audrey81 3,027]

17 hours ago, oliver2 said:

Oh she’s LOVELY, the way she’s looking at the camera like she’s deliberately sharing the experience of peeing in the waves with us. The sensibility, the vibe behind it is a lot like @Audrey81‘s posts (but A. would have shown us a thicker, stronger pee stream!)

Why thank you that's very kind 🙂 

[F.W 5,734]

Isnt she the girl that was in "Different Strokes"?(apt title perhaps)She went into porn afterwards and died young i believe.I cant remember her name,Dana something or other?