Jump to content

You're now a rich dictator...


Recommended Posts

In the light of todays horrific events in Las Vegas today,in MY country,ALL weapons would be illegal.You want to shoot guns,and kill people-join my army,you will get the opportunity!I have grand plans for world domination,which will just suit all you gun nuts...In MY country there will be no "pest control"ALL wildlife however perceived as "vermin" will be protected.Species like crows,woodpigeons,can be "controlled,but by Govt agencies,rather than farmers just blasting away,those non-native species like Grey Squirrel,Mink etc,will be controlled by Govt agents.But private ownership of firearms,crossbows,swords etc,illegal.

Link to post
On ‎02‎/‎10‎/‎2017 at 5:37 PM, fannywatcher said:

.But private ownership of firearms,crossbows,swords etc,illegal.

They'd be illegal in my little dictatorship too. 

But private possession of pee porn - and the public sharing of it - would be not only fully legal but actively encouraged with financial incentives. 

Anyone who nevertheless gets hold of a gun and commits an atrocity with it, will be incarcerated for life if captured alive - and denied all access to pee porn or any other form of sexual stimulation. 

Link to post
3 hours ago, fannywatcher said:

Agreed.However kiddie fiddlers,or those who have kiddie porn,upon conviction would face mandatory full castration,no more meat and 2 veg.Also the age of consent would be 16.

Trouble is, not all paedophiles or possessors of paedophile porn are male. Some are female. And irreversible removals are problematic when it comes to proven wrongful convictions. Nor does it always inhibit sex drive. Sometimes it can make someone divert their lusts into non-penile pleasures, usually involving sadism. In other words, it could make some worse. I'd just lock repeat offenders up for life - unless they are foreign in which case they'd have been kicked out after a first offence and permanently banned from re-entry. First time offenders would get long prison sentences - life in the worst cases - with mandatory chemical castration to reduce libido and sexual interest - which is reversible and can work with both genders. Such offenders will be permanently denied access to the internet. If caught flouting this it will be treated automatically as a second offence with a life term. They'd automatically be placed on a sex offenders' register and would have to report to the police every day.  If they choose to leave my nation, by way of encouragement, the state will buy them a one way air fare, then bar them permanently from re-entry.

I would not want to encourage paedos and my little dictatorship will make them feel very unwelcome. But I would not wish to criminalise sexual experimentation amongst the under 16s, which is normal behaviour by the time kids reach their teens. But I would want to discourage adults old enough to know better from meddling sexually with youngsters. So I would adopt a flexible age of consent. Mostly 16, but 14 where the age difference is less than two years, but 18 where the age difference is more than 12 years. Naughty peeing by minors would not be illegal in any way - I'd want my citizens to grow up viewing this as natural - but it would be a criminal offence for adults to encourage it purely for their own viewing pleasure, or to film it.

I don't want to encourage a society where adults get their jollies by watching their kids peeing, but do want to encourage the kind of society where kids who pee in naughty places are not made to feel bad about it if discovered, and where such fun is considered acceptable and not frowned upon. I don't want my society's children growing up brainwashed into viewing pee as dirty or disgusting. 

Link to post

No,i think children under 16 should be protected from any sexualisation.Even from each other..If its illegal,then its illegal.Such loopholes are exploited by adults.If as kids they are playing "mummies and daddies" then thats ok,but at no point should any form of adult interaction be considered acceptable.I would even say not taking steps to try ensure your kids cannot be seen naked by adults should be illegal.

Link to post
On 25.07.2017 at 1:38 AM, Sephora said:

Having that kind of power, women will be able to bring their boyfriends/husbands with them so that they are used as emergency toilet pee slaves (for the one's that are into that. This will cut in the expenses on water and toilet paper (think green).

The other, no more porta porty's, they are gross and women can freely pee outdoors as much as men do. Peeing outdoors, hiking, jogging and in public pools will be accepted.

I think the right law would be : when a lady asks the help of a man to serve her being her human toilet for a pee ,  the man will immediately accept it and will try to serve the lady to relieve as comfortable as possible in his mouth letting her fresh and clean after.

and the other : a lady can pee wherever she wants!

Link to post

I would have basic public decency laws,my society would have plenty of options for us urofetishists to indulge.Like pay per view ladies toilets as described above,in which willing girls can make money by volunteering to allow guys to watch them.

Link to post
23 hours ago, fannywatcher said:

No,i think children under 16 should be protected from any sexualisation.Even from each other..If its illegal,then its illegal.Such loopholes are exploited by adults.If as kids they are playing "mummies and daddies" then thats ok,but at no point should any form of adult interaction be considered acceptable.I would even say not taking steps to try ensure your kids cannot be seen naked by adults should be illegal.

Well, you'd need a crash course in my laws before you'd be allowed into my little dictatorship, lol. Because I would tolerate no sexual interaction between adults and children whatsoever. I do though simply see no point in making natural sexual experimentation between older teenagers something they should be made criminals over. I bet at least half this forum lost their virginity before the legal age of consent.

Anyway, this thread is supposed to be a fun thread, not one for serious debates and arguments. So you do what you want in your little dictatorship and I'll do the same in mine...and let's stop sniping at each other's laws.

This is supposed to be a fun thread about imaginary  pee paradises, not a vehicle for serious debates about gun control. the age of consent or any serious shit like that. We have a part of the forum especially designed for that. This thread is not it!

Link to post

Interesting topic. But I think my approach is way different from that of most people here.;)

First of all, i see no reason to force my own preference to my citizens. It just doesn't seem right - let alone the fact that it might cause an uprising if you force people to do something against their will. Especially since my interest lies in naughty peeing, which I doubt the majority of the population will like. ;)

So I would not ban all toilets, I'd rather have more public toilets. Currently, many cities over here on Germany have close many public toilets, and now fine anyone caught peeing in public by the police. I would end this practice. Who does not want to pee in public, shouldn't. The fines for getting caught should be reduced, and the police is going to turn a blind eye (unless the public pee'er overdoes it), as there are far worse crimes to deal with.   Besides; I'd like to get to know those ladies who decide to pee in, say, an ally, even if there are plenty of public toilets available - as opposed to those ladies who would prefer not to pee in an ally, but HAVE to, due to the lack of public toilets.

 Thats why I will have access to the files of the cases of public pee'ers that have been caught - for... personal interest.

Another thing I'd like to see would be a public dating site - state-controlled - which is available to all the citizens. All the data you enter is anonymized, as you can enter very specific data about everything.. .like, for instance, fetishes.  If the algorithm finds a match, the to people involved can start to chat with each other and decide to share information more detailed - like  photos.

The users of the site can - and should - give feedback on how well it works, so it's algorithms can be optimized. Usage of this site is for free, of cause. I would have a fake account there, to find someone who matches. I'd also have some kind of apartment where I could meet someone I fancy - I don't want to attract a lady who just wants to bang the head of state, but an actual partner.

Hmm, I think thats basically it.I could write more about thinks like taxation, crime-prevention and punishment, how banks should work and so on, but thats all beyond the original topic, I think. ;)
 

Link to post

Of course in a dictatorship uprisings are generally frowned upon and put down most vigourously.Like Colonel Gaddafi,my most personal guard would be the best female soldiers we have,they are more incorruptible than men,and my own life guards would be the best regiment made from the toughest men,like the Praetorian Guard of Rome,or the Leibstandarte of the 3rd Reich.

Link to post

I like the idea of an all-female personal guard. I will set up such a force as soon as I can. Recruits will be chosen for their physical fitness, sexual allure, and general all round willingness to pee wherever they like, which they will be given total freedom to do.

I would also employ a large number of live-in female cleaners for my presidential palace, who'd be extremely well paid for cleaning up after everybody's random pissings. They too would be chosen for their sexual allure and willingness to pee anywhere.

Link to post

As President for life of the Pee State Republic and absolute dictator, I wish to announce the following. 

My capital city will be renamed Golden Fountains.

Performance art featuring on stage urination displays like this.......

4.jpg

........will receive lucrative state sponsorship, with such shows also being televised.

And I personally would offer the artiste on the right enough money to retire on if she were to spend a weekend at my Presidential palace, doing that all over my carpets and floors, lol.

I personally will set up my own strip and lap-dancing nightclub where the strippers and lap dancers will be paid to include peeing on the stage or the floor or upon tables as part of their performance. Drinking on the job will be encouraged to facilitate this. And if any customer wants to be peed on and the lady is willing to do it for whatever is on offer, that would be encouraged too, not to mention fully legal. I would have ladies' nights where the strippers are male - equal opportunities and all that - and the club would be rented out to hen night and stag night parties who wish to include such fun.

And as for this young lady......

221.jpg

I'd offer her a handsome salary just for letting me piss on her gorgeous ass whenever I felt like it.  I'd treble that if she'd piss on my face from time to time, lol.

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
  • 1 year later...

To revive this interesting topic,as im a rich and generally beneficial dictator,everyday,any girls are encouraged to visit my headquarters,whereupon one lucky girl will be given 20 years free sanitary products,and up to £1000 depending on her willingness to perform sex acts.

This is not a mandatory thing,women will be encouraged,its a voluntary,fun thing,my way as president,of trying to become popular among my people,but once they have signed the form,the very least they must do,is pee in front of me.Or they can stay as my guest for the day,and enjoy my hospitality.A nice meal will be provided etc.

So,my staff have narrowed down the field for that day.Now i have to choose one girl from this group to do the minimum let me watch her pee(£100),then blow job(£500),swallow(£800) and sex(£1000).

From these girls,the lucky girl will be extreme left.The others will also earn £50 for at least volunteering.

If you had to choose,which one?

Groups-Of-Nude-Girls-12.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to post

Well @F.W - you're probably hoping your dictatorship lasts more than a week - in which case is it not more a case of what order you'd like to invite your willing subjects in? (and on the seventh day you may rest...)

For me (and it's ludicrous that I'd find myself in the position of having choice) it would be number 3, 4 or 5 - purely on guessing their attitude and personality. Three looks like she'd be good engaging company - five for me looks the most fun.

  • Like 1
Link to post

Just been thinking about the dictator thing a bit more...   Was watching a repeat of the Michael Palin visit to North Korea documentary a couple of nights ago.  Palin, UK comedian, former Monty Python member and more recently travel documentary maker and writer is given a hosted insight into the closed world of North Korea.

In the first part he was mesmerised (and so was I to be fair) at seeing the female traffic control officers. Apparently there is a rumour that Kim chooses them personally, which is the link to this thread.  Their movements have to be seen to be fair, lots of very swift and precise arm and leg swinging in a weirdly erotic way (maybe just to me!).  I sort of imagined how much extra pressure that would put on an end-of-shift desperate bladder.

kb-michael-palin-in-north-korea-3.png

  • Like 1
Link to post

I like Steve's ideas. 

Anyway. 

I wouldn't even bother with public urinals, people would be peeing anywhere anyway, so yeah. 

I would however also have paved surfaces and interiors designed to drain the pee away, this reducing costs.

Toilets will be monitored to make sure not a single drop of pee goes in. You are however allowed to pee over the edge of the toilet. The toilets will also be designed specifically to make it difficult to pee in anyway.I would also ban changing rooms as you go not need a private room to change in. Toilets would also be unisex and open.

Public sex will be legal after 10pm.

And while I'm at it I'd make my conlang the official language. I don't care it's hard to pronounce, it's not impossible.

I don't know, just thinking out loud. 

Link to post
13 hours ago, F.W said:

So here are my choices for today.

I think 2nd from right will be todays lucky girl who will pee for her beloved leader.

group1.jpg

Good choice my leader HAHAHAHAH

I could also love to have the 2nd from left

  • Love 1
Link to post
19 hours ago, F.W said:

So here are my choices for today.

I think 2nd from right will be todays lucky girl who will pee for her beloved leader.

group1.jpg

I think instead I'd let the girls choose between themselves....   The first girl on the left is welcome to take one (or rather give one) for the team in my opinion

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post

As today is their beloved leaders 5th anniversary,all the girls in this group will be eager to please their benevolent and most mighty leader in any way they can.

Cold baths and plenty of drinking water is provided.Save your pee girls,until you all need to go,as i will be needing a group golden shower.

Then at least 3 of you will be required to sexually satisfy me.As its a public holiday,you will all receive a £1000 bonus.Now,am i not the most benevolent?

nude grp.jpg

Link to post
  • 4 weeks later...

Here is my choice for today.Each of these girls will have volunteered herself as a possible sexual partner for the day,in return each will receive various benefits,but the girl 2nd from left will be my choice,she will have to at least pee for me,then depending upon her willingness to indulge in sexual activity,she will receive more benefits.Im a very beneficial dictator.

group2.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Hot 1
Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...