Jump to content

What do other pee/adult sites you visit offer?


Recommended Posts

Hey guys, I'm sure most of you visit several other other pee/adult sites, and I'm curious to know what features about those sites you like most? I'm always looking to improve this site and offer more to members, and perhaps the best way to find out what you guys want is by seeing what you're getting elsewhere?

For example, do you visit other sites simply for more pictures & videos? Is there a certain feature one site has that you like?

I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on this, as it might inspire some new features and improvements here.

  • Like 1
Link to post

It depends what I am looking for. I primarily visit porn sites because I am seeking out peeing pics or vids that turn me on, especially ones featuring girls peeing in the naughtiest places. My favourite performers in this field tend to be MissPiss, TamTamSouth, Leah, Sinna, Ebonycandiegirl, and WetFetishCat.

When I want pee porn, I will check out the new pics and vids here as well as the galleries on Peesearch. But my first ports of call tend to be EroProfile, PeeTeeVee, Motherless.com, clips4sale, and MissPiss's site which I am signed up as a member of as part of the deal for buying premium membership here.

Sometimes I prefer reading erotic pee stories. This site, followed by Peesearch, tends to be my first port of call then, though Literotica is another site to look at.

I can't speak for others, but forums such as this tend not to be my top sites for seeking out pee porn. There are countless sites elsewhere on the net that specialise in porn pics and vids, and most I encounter here or on PS I have already seen before. The pee porn pics and vids here are a great attraction and a definite added bonus. But the stories written by others are far more of an attraction here because there are far fewer other sites on the net that provide good literary peeing erotica. This site, Peesearch, and Literotica are the only sites which provide lots of this. When I post my own stories, this site is my first choice, though many of them do eventually end up on Peesearch too.

But what this site has above all else - it's major attraction and unique selling point - is it's great sense of community and absence of backstabbing and cliques, combined with it's acceptance of naughty peeing without qualms from the very start. And I love the pee-related discussions that take place here and which only Peesearch can compete with you on.

In short, porn is so readily accessible out there that it is not the main attraction to me here, but more of an added bonus, as well as this site being somewhere where I can post some of my own stash of pics. The social interaction, general pee talk, and stories are the main attraction to me here, though.

For me, Peesearch and here are the only pee forums in the field that interest me very much. Both blow the rest of the competition out of the water. Both forums offer much the same. But you have PS beat when it comes to your system of positive ratings, and sense of community without the feeling that certain cliques secretly hate my guts, which I still can't help suspecting on PS. I feel fully accepted, respected and generally liked by all the key membership here. Not quite sure that is the same on PS. I suspect one or two popular members there of harbouring much personal dislike of me. Thus, whilst I enjoy some of the content of both forums, I truly feel at home here, and if I had to choose, this would be the one where my first allegience lies now.

But PS does have a chatroom, which this site lacks. I personally never really go into the PS chatroom all that often, so this is not a major attraction for me. But there may well be some who regard this as a major deficit here. If any chatroom here can be made more female friendly than the one on PS, and was a place where girls preferred to come, this could be a major boost to this site.

I guess I would like to see a bit more naughty peeing erotica being written here, and pee erotica of various kinds more generally. Not sure how to encourage it though, beyond contributing what I can myself. Perhaps advertising this site on Literotica? Not sure if they allow ads, but would be a great way of introducing this site to pee erotica writers if the ad appears in their fetish section where their pee stories are.

  • Like 2
Link to post
  • 2 weeks later...

omorashi.org is my go-to these days for videos. It's a really well-run forum with a huge library of content and active contributors. other than that, Steve pretty much hit the nail on the head in terms of vids and stories. unfortunately high-quality sources of content in our area of interest are extremely limited. i'm new to this site but it seems energetic and promising. cheers!

  • Like 1
Link to post
  • 2 weeks later...

I appreciate all the responses. To those just listing the sites they visit, what is it that they actually offer that makes you visit them? Is it just lots of regular picture/video content?

Link to post
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
I really enjoy Eroprofile has lots of vids updated daily and a search facility as well

Agreed, eroprofile is one of the only other pee sites I visit and I really would recommend it to anyone here who doesn't already use it. Having said that, my plan is eventually to recreate something similar here with lots of videos and a search function that properly functions (eroprofile is one of the best for searches, but still the majority of searches won't work. I'm planning to use categories, keywords and tags to get around this - plus more appropriately titled videos ) Still, that's a whole separate issue, any other feedback on websites you use? Essentially I'm wanting to know what you get from other pee sites, in order to try and get some ideas for what else you might like to see on this website!

Link to post

I'm always on the hunt for new picture or video material. I've found that community sites like this and PeeSearch have been great places to find something original (or a much loved favourite from the past). I also like the way both sites encourage participation and discussion. Trawling through a million pictures gates boring and the interaction with fellow fetishists is both interesting and refreshing ... not to mention a rare opportunity since this facet of my life is, shall we say, not entirely public.

I hope the chat page gets into gear. The ability to talk, whether it's about peeing or not, is under appreciated. Just the fact that there are no taboos in the conversation allows much freer discourse.

The last item on my shopping list is ideas ... Things to try, places to visit, etc. I've gotten good stuff from both sites and I'm sure I'll get more.

In the end, though, it's the community spirit that will keep me here or cause me to wander. I like what I see so far and I've found names I recognise (Steve, Miss Piss, Demoniac, Adrian), which makes me feel right at home. Keep up the great work.

  • Like 1
Link to post
I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on this, as it might inspire some new features and improvements here.

A feature that I enjoy on some sites is the ability to place comments next to posted images and videos. The equivalent here would be to have a comment button next to each image posted in a picture thread, so a person could leave their comment next to that particular picture.

(At the moment when I want to comment on a picture, I add a post to the thread, and "quote" the picture in my post)

I suppose this is more of a "gallery" function than a forum function, but it would be nice to have as a way of keeping comments about a single image together in the long picture threads.

Link to post

I like:

eroprofile (not much amateur stuff but occasionally appears)

xtube (plenty of good amateur pee stuff)

peesearch (like here but less friendly to 'naughty' girls!)

newbienudes (good amateur pee stuff)

miss piss (of course!)

sneakypee

projectpee

clips4sale

oneclickchicks

Also like searching youtube and twitter for the occasional gem

peeteevee (seems to be a bit slow lately)

xx

  • Like 1
Link to post
  • 2 weeks later...

When I was first introduced to this site I initially disliked it and actually didn't visit. My reasons being all the videos were jumbled into one place (I passed this on and it has been resolved with categories) and posts that didn't really add much to the discussion. Things such as "Who here likes pee" Make an educated guess, we're on a pee forum! I still see posts like that here and there, things such as "nice site" Short, pointless and off topic. or I see several topics created for the same thing. Just little pet hates really. I'm used to places where posts are more enforced quality wise. Quality rather than quantity as they say. Overall I'm happy with this site though, there are just a couple of things that bug me.

Sorry for the unhelpful post, I'm not too great at putting it into words.

Link to post
When I was first introduced to this site I initially disliked it and actually didn't visit. My reasons being all the videos were jumbled into one place (I passed this on and it has been resolved with categories) and posts that didn't really add much to the discussion. Things such as "Who here likes pee" Make an educated guess, we're on a pee forum! I still see posts like that here and there, things such as "nice site" Short, pointless and off topic. or I see several topics created for the same thing. Just little pet hates really. I'm used to places where posts are more enforced quality wise. Quality rather than quantity as they say. Overall I'm happy with this site though, there are just a couple of things that bug me.

Sorry for the unhelpful post, I'm not too great at putting it into words.

I see your point, however being the judge of what's pointless and what's not isn't an easy job on a site that gets a decent amount of posts. If I started deleting posts that didn't necessarily add to the discussion, but also weren't breaking the terms & rules, people might get offended and confused by this. If I could enforce a rule that says 'all posts must be constructive and good quality' I would, but quality can be subjective. I'm reluctant to delete posts because I don't think they're as good as others.

As the site is growing and my time is being taken up with other things, I don't get time to read every post any more either, hence the introduction of moderators. If you see two identical threads please report them. Additionally, if you see a post you think is totally irrelevant, feel free to report that too.

Generally when there have been random short comments like 'nice site', the member hasn't posted often and has just done this in the Introductions area. If there are users with lots of posts continually making these kind of comments, once again, anyone is free to anonymously report them. Obviously we'd like all posts to be high quality - and to be fair a lot of them are - I just don't see a fair or manageable way to always ensure that.

Link to post
I see your point, however being the judge of what's pointless and what's not isn't an easy job on a site that gets a decent amount of posts. If I started deleting posts that didn't necessarily add to the discussion, but also weren't breaking the terms & rules, people might get offended and confused by this. If I could enforce a rule that says 'all posts must be constructive and good quality' I would, but quality can be subjective. I'm reluctant to delete posts because I don't think they're as good as others.

As the site is growing and my time is being taken up with other things, I don't get time to read every post any more either, hence the introduction of moderators. If you see two identical threads please report them. Additionally, if you see a post you think is totally irrelevant, feel free to report that too.

Generally when there have been random short comments like 'nice site', the member hasn't posted often and has just done this in the Introductions area. If there are users with lots of posts continually making these kind of comments, once again, anyone is free to anonymously report them. Obviously we'd like all posts to be high quality - and to be fair a lot of them are - I just don't see a fair or manageable way to always ensure that.

PS has a rule against short or meaningless posts, with the line being drawn at the discretion of the mods. Such posts are a much worse problem there because access to all pics and vids is only gained by those who have contributed 15 posts, and it often happens that newbies rock up with no intention of contributing but rapidly posting 15 posts of shite, or one or two word posts, or very brief and repetitive single sentences, eg "I liked that", or "That was hot", etc.

Of course, discretion is an unpredictable thing and in borderline cases, one mod might allow a post that another would delete. And since this rule at PS was primarily designed to limit vid and pic access to good contributors, those who already had a high post count and thus a proven track record as good contributors would sometimes be treated more leniently than newbies under this rule. But to newcomers this could potentially look like favouritism or unfairness or general cliqueyness. Generally speaking, whenever a rule is open to interpretation, there is the potential for contradictory moderation which might cause animosity.

I guess if the forum were to to start being swamped by repetitive one-liners that contributed little it could be a problem, but I do not see it as being a massive problem now. And I would be very reluctant to delete a post because of this unless the same person were contributing large numbers of such posts. I would always prefer either to have some rule or other to interpret, or guidance from you before acting in most cases, unless it is obvious spam, or anything illegal.

If we had to institute any rule in regards to worthwhile posts I would suggest a minimum character limit rather than leaving it to moderator discretion, combined with the fact that it must be intelligible and not obvious nonsense. But then of course there would be entire threads - eg the counting, or country naming, or word association threads that would themselves fall foul of this, so Admin at least would need to assume the right to grant exemption from this rule for certain threads. And then it could all get very complicated.

It's not really a big problem now, though. So I tend to think that if it aint broke, don't fix it.

Link to post

A minimum character count could easily be introduced - and forum games could surely be excluded - but I've never been a believer of such a system on forums. As Sophie said herself, it's quality not quantity. In some cases longer posts simply aren't necessarily. If someone has said everything they wanted to say in their post, they shouldn't have to add extra to it. Forums that do introduce such a system generally just end up with people adding pointless extra characters to their posts to 'trick the system' (e.g. dots at the end of their post or an unrelated rambling). That's just my view and so I pretty much agree with all of that. Like you said, since to access our videos you need post ratings not posts, members will quickly realise posting lots of pointless posts to gain access won't achieve anything.

Of course, I never dismiss any idea completely, if anyone has anything else to add or a way this could potentially be improved, please do say.

Link to post
A minimum character count could easily be introduced - and forum games could surely be excluded - but I've never been a believer of such a system on forums. As Sophie said herself, it's quality not quantity. In some cases longer posts simply aren't necessarily. If someone has said everything they wanted to say in their post, they shouldn't have to add extra to it. Forums that do introduce such a system generally just end up with people adding pointless extra characters to their posts to 'trick the system' (e.g. dots at the end of their post or an unrelated rambling). That's just my view and so I pretty much agree with all of that. Like you said, since to access our videos you need post ratings not posts, members will quickly realise posting lots of pointless posts to gain access won't achieve anything.

Of course, I never dismiss any idea completely, if anyone has anything else to add or a way this could potentially be improved, please do say.

Of course, I take your point. Since you put it like that, I can see that such a rule could be way too rigid. If the time ever arose when something was needed in terms of a rule, I guess we would have to fall back on a very well thought out and well worded rule allowing for common sense moderator discretion, in combination with very good moderation by mods interpreting it fairly and consistently. Not totally straight forward, but if it were necessary I am sure we could do it.

But like I said, I don't think there is any pressing need for such a rule right now, and hope that it stays that way.

As far as simple character counts are concerned, one way of improving the idea, though, might be to limit any minimum character rule to those with less than a certain number of positive ratings, ie to relative newbies only. Those who have already demonstrated worthwhile contributions by earning many positive ratings tend not to post much in the way of meaningless shite, but tend instead to have something worthwhile to share or contribute, however long or short.

Link to post
Sophie ,

I do agree with you on those who come here to just view the videos & pictures . This site has to offer . These members don't wish to contribute anything worth of value in a discussion on here . They make short pointless posts . To just get enough to watch the videos and nothing else.

This shouldn't be allowed . That more strict rules governing admittance to the video section . Should be nore enforced on those members . Who don't wish to contribute to the website as a whole and not permitted to view the video section / anywhere else here on this site . Until they DO contribute something of value

Like I said, it already stands that post ratings are required to view videos, not just posts. A member can't spam and gain access unless other members positively rate their posts (and they can only do that after receiving several positive ratings themselves). As for restricting other areas of the site, I'm not sure that'd be too wise. This is a free and public site, but I understand your desire to encourage people to contribute useful content.

As far as simple character counts are concerned, one way of improving the idea, though, might be to limit any minimum character rule to those with less than a certain number of positive ratings, ie to relative newbies only. Those who have already demonstrated worthwhile contributions by earning many positive ratings tend not to post much in the way of meaningless shite, but tend instead to have something worthwhile to share or contribute, however long or short.

This is the only way I can see it working, and again it would only affect the size of posts not necessarily the quality; the two don't always go hand in hand. But you're right, if these kind of messages become too frequent I think this could potentially work, same with the 'common sense' rule you mentioned.

Link to post
I see your point, however being the judge of what's pointless and what's not isn't an easy job on a site that gets a decent amount of posts. If I started deleting posts that didn't necessarily add to the discussion, but also weren't breaking the terms & rules, people might get offended and confused by this. If I could enforce a rule that says 'all posts must be constructive and good quality' I would, but quality can be subjective. I'm reluctant to delete posts because I don't think they're as good as others.

As the site is growing and my time is being taken up with other things, I don't get time to read every post any more either, hence the introduction of moderators. If you see two identical threads please report them. Additionally, if you see a post you think is totally irrelevant, feel free to report that too.

Generally when there have been random short comments like 'nice site', the member hasn't posted often and has just done this in the Introductions area. If there are users with lots of posts continually making these kind of comments, once again, anyone is free to anonymously report them. Obviously we'd like all posts to be high quality - and to be fair a lot of them are - I just don't see a fair or manageable way to always ensure that.

Although while its good to have some female members of course,theres a danger of women commenting negatively on what is mainly,obviously,a MALE fetish.

Link to post

I think its good that anyone can post anything they feel,i hope related to the sexual subject of course,we wouldnt want anything along the lines of "Which is best Xbox One,or PS4?",but im happy to read anything.I cant imagine reading anything posted on here a website called "Watch Girls Peeing" and be offended by it.Its what i joined in the first place really.

Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...